United Airlines Flight Loses Landing Gear Tire During Takeoff, No Injuries Reported

Boeing 777-200 aircraft is designed to land safely with missing or damaged landing gear
Incident happened at approximately 11:35 am as the plane was on route to Osaka, Japan
No injuries reported
United Airlines flight loses landing gear tire during takeoff
United Airlines Flight Loses Landing Gear Tire During Takeoff, No Injuries Reported

On Thursday, March 7th, a United Airlines flight departing from San Francisco International Airport to Osaka, Japan lost one of its landing gear tires during takeoff. The incident happened at approximately 11:35 am as the plane was on route to Osaka. No injuries were reported and the runway was briefly closed off to clear debris before reopening for regular operation.

The Boeing 777-200 aircraft is designed to land safely with missing or damaged landing gear, but this incident highlights the importance of proper maintenance and safety checks on all planes. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will investigate the cause of the accident.



Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • Are there any reports of similar incidents in the past?
  • Is it possible that there were other factors contributing to this accident?

Sources

67%

  • Unique Points
    • A tire fell off of a United Airlines plane moments after it took off from SFO on Thursday.
    • <https://www.fox35orlando.com/news/united-plane-loses-tire-after-taking-off>
  • Accuracy
    • <br>The aircraft is designed to land safely with missing or damaged tires, according to the airline.<br>
    • <br>It's rare for such an incident to occur and it comes with older planes.<br>
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that a tire fell off a United Airlines plane after taking off from SFO and caused damage to parked cars nearby. However, this is not entirely accurate as it does not mention that the wheel was part of an aircraft's landing gear strut and had been designed to land safely with missing or damaged tires. Secondly, the article quotes aviation lawyer Mary Schiavo stating that this event is rare and comes with older planes which implies a sense of danger when in fact there are redundancies built into the design of these planes to ensure safe landing even if one tire fails. Lastly, the article does not disclose any sources.
    • The title of the article implies that a tire fell off a United Airlines plane after taking off from SFO and caused damage to parked cars nearby.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (75%)
    The article contains a statement from an aviation lawyer that the incident is rare and comes with older planes. This implies a bias towards newer planes being safer than older ones.
    • ]This is,
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of United Airlines as they are reporting on an incident involving one of their planes. The article mentions that the plane in question is a Boeing 777-200 aircraft which is manufactured by Boeing, a company with whom KTVU FOX 2 may have financial ties or professional affiliations.
      • The article states that the incident involved a United Airlines plane. The author does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest they may have on this topic.

      88%

      • Unique Points
        • A tire fell off a United Airlines flight departing from San Francisco International Airport to Osaka, Japan on Thursday morning.
        • , At approximately 11:35 a.m., United Flight 35 lost a portion of landing gear tire during takeoff.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (50%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that a tire fell off United Flight 35 during takeoff from San Francisco International Airport to Osaka. However, this information contradicts the video footage shown which shows that the plane landed safely at LAX before falling apart and losing its landing gear tire while on approach to SFO.
        • The article claims that a tire fell off United Flight 35 during takeoff from San Francisco International Airport to Osaka. However, this information contradicts the video footage shown which shows that the plane landed safely at LAX before falling apart and losing its landing gear tire while on approach to SFO.
        • United Airlines states in their statement that they will work with customers as well as with the owners of the damaged vehicles in SFO to ensure their needs are addressed. However, this is not mentioned anywhere else in the article.
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      60%

      • Unique Points
        • United Airlines Flight UAL35 lost a tire during takeoff from San Francisco International Airport.
        • , The incident happened at approximately 11:35 a.m. as United flight 35 was on route to Osaka, Japan.
      • Accuracy
        • The incident happened at approximately 11:35 a.m.
        • In a statement, the Federal Aviation Administration said it will investigate the cause of the accident.
      • Deception (30%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that United Airlines Flight UAL35 lost a tire during takeoff from San Francisco International Airport but fails to mention where this happened or what caused it. This omission implies that the incident was not significant enough to warrant further investigation and could be seen as an attempt to downplay its importance. Secondly, the author quotes Doug Yakel, a spokesperson for SFO airport, stating that there were no injuries but fails to mention any damage done by the fallen tire or how it affected operations at San Francisco International Airport. This omission implies that the incident was not as serious as it could have been and could be seen as an attempt to minimize its impact. Lastly, the author quotes LAX representative Dae Levine stating that operationally this didn't have an impact but fails to mention any potential safety concerns or risks posed by landing a plane with missing or damaged landing gear. This omission implies that the incident was not significant enough to warrant further investigation and could be seen as an attempt to downplay its importance.
        • The article claims that United Airlines Flight UAL35 lost a tire during takeoff from San Francisco International Airport but fails to mention where this happened or what caused it. This omission implies that the incident was not significant enough to warrant further investigation and could be seen as an attempt to downplay its importance.
        • The article quotes LAX representative Dae Levine stating that operationally this didn't have an impact but fails to mention any potential safety concerns or risks posed by landing a plane with missing or damaged landing gear. This omission implies that the incident was not significant enough to warrant further investigation and could be seen as an attempt to downplay its importance.
        • The author quotes Doug Yakel, a spokesperson for SFO airport, stating that there were no injuries but fails to mention any damage done by the fallen tire or how it affected operations at San Francisco International Airport. This omission implies that the incident was not as serious as it could have been and could be seen as an attempt to minimize its impact.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Federal Aviation Administration's statement without providing any context or evidence for their investigation into the cause of the accident. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of no injuries on the ground and operationally not impacting LAX as if they are mutually exclusive when in fact one does not negate the other. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing damage to vehicles without providing any information about their extent or severity.
        • The Federal Aviation Administration said it will investigate the cause of the accident.
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      76%

      • Unique Points
        • . The tire debris landed in an employee parking lot at the airport.
        • . A United Airlines flight lost one of its tires during takeoff from San Francisco on Thursday, causing the Japan-bound plane to be diverted to Los Angeles.
        • .
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (30%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that a tire fell off during takeoff when it actually happened after takeoff. Secondly, the sentence 'A United Airlines flight loses a landing gear tire as it takes off from San Francisco Airport' is misleading because it suggests that this was an incident that occurred during takeoff but in reality, it happened after. Thirdly, the article states that no one was injured and the runway was briefly closed to clear debris which implies there were no damages caused by the incident when footage shows a damaged car in a parking lot following the incident.
        • The title of the article is misleading because it suggests that a tire fell off during takeoff but actually happened after.
        • Foothage shows the tire falling off seconds after takeoff.
        • The sentence 'A United Airlines flight loses a landing gear tire as it takes off from San Francisco Airport' is misleading because it implies that this was an incident that occurred during takeoff but in reality, it happened after.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication