On March 5, between the hours of 3 p.m. and 5 p.m (Sanaa time), U.S., Lithuanian, Estonian, Latvian and Norwegian forces shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile and three one-way attack unmanned aerial systems launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen toward USS Carney (DDG 64) in the Red Sea. The missiles and USVs were located in Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen.
On March 5, between the hours of 3 p.m. and 5 p.m (Sanaa time), U.S., Lithuanian, Estonian, Latvian and Norwegian forces shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile and three one-way attack unmanned aerial systems launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen toward USS Carney (DDG 64) in the Red Sea. The missiles and USVs were located in Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen.
, officials said early Wednesday, as the Indian navy released images of it fighting a fire aboard a container ship earlier targeted by the Houthis. , The assault Tuesday apparently targeted the USS Carney, an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer that has been involved in the American campaign against the rebels who have launched attacks over Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza Strip.
The Houthi attack involved bomb-carrying drones and one anti-ship ballistic missile, the U.S. military’s Central Command said., The U.S. later launched an airstrike destroying three anti-ship missiles and three bomb-carrying drone boats, Central Command said.
The Houthis have not offered any assessment of the damage they’ve suffered in the American-led strikes that began in January, though it has said at least 22 of its fighters have been killed.
Accuracy
The Houthis have not offered any assessment of the damage they’ve suffered in the American-led strikes that began in January, though it has said at least 22 of its fighters have been killed., Since November, , The rebels have repeatedly targeted ships in the Red Sea and surrounding waters over the Israel-Hamas war. Those vessels have included at least one with cargo bound for Iran, the Houthis’ main benefactor, and an aid ship later bound for Houthi-controlled territory.
They include the attack last month on a cargo ship carrying fertilizer, the Rubymar, which sank on Saturday after drifting for several days.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author does not disclose any sources and only quotes statements from official military spokespeople without providing context or evidence to support their claims. Secondly, the article uses sensationalist language such as 'attack' and 'destruction' when describing events that were likely minor incidents compared to other attacks by Yemeni rebels in recent months. Thirdly, the author omits any mention of civilian casualties caused by US airstrikes against Houthi targets, which is relevant information for readers to know. Lastly, the article uses selective reporting and only mentions events that support the narrative of US involvement in Yemen without providing a balanced view.
Omission of civilian casualties caused by US airstrikes against Houthi targets
The author does not disclose any sources
Sensationalist language used: 'attack' and 'destruction'
Selective reporting to support the narrative of US involvement in Yemen
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the US military's Central Command said that Houthi forces targeted two American warships without elaborating on this claim. Additionally, the author quotes a statement from Brig. Gen. Yahya Saree of the Houthis which is also an appeal to authority as he claims that his forces will not stop until aggression stops and Gaza siege ends.
The US military's Central Command said that Houthi forces targeted two American warships without elaborating on this claim.
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards the Houthi rebels and their attacks on US ships. The author uses language that demonizes the Houthis as aggressors who will not stop until they achieve their goals of ending Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza Strip. Additionally, the author quotes a Houthi military spokesman without providing any context or counter-argument to his claims.
The article uses language that demonizes the Houthis as aggressors who will not stop until they achieve their goals of ending Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza Strip.
USS Carney shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile and three one-way attack unmanned aerial systems launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m.
Several hours later, CENTCOM forces destroyed three anti-ship missiles and three unmanned surface vessels (USV) in self-defense
The Houthis have repeatedly targeted ships in the Red Sea and surrounding waters over Israel-Hamas war since November
Accuracy
The Houthis acknowledged the attack on USS Carney but did not acknowledge the later U.S airstrikes
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it claims that the USS Carney shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile and three one-way attack unmanned aerial systems launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m Sanaa time, CENTCOM said.
The article claims that the USS Carney shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile and three one-way attack unmanned aerial systems launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m Sanaa time, CENTCOM said.
Fallacies
(85%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes the Houthis by referring to them as 'Iranian-backed rebels'. This is a clear example of ideological bias and demonization. Secondly, there are multiple instances where the author quotes sources without providing any context or analysis about their credibility or reliability. For instance, when reporting on CENTCOM's statement that USS Carney shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile and three one-way attack unmanned aerial systems launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m., the author does not provide any information about CENTCOM's reputation or reliability, making it difficult for readers to determine whether this statement is accurate or trustworthy. Thirdly, there are several instances where the author uses language that implies a moral superiority of US forces over Houthi rebels and their actions. For example, when reporting on USS Carney taking 'self-defense' strikes against Houthi projectiles posed to launch at commercial ships in the Red Sea, the author does not provide any context or analysis about whether these actions were necessary or proportionate given the circumstances. This is a clear example of monetary bias as it implies that US forces have an unlimited budget and resources for military action.
The article uses language that dehumanizes the Houthis by referring to them as 'Iranian-backed rebels'.
There are multiple instances where the author quotes sources without providing any context or analysis about their credibility or reliability. For instance, when reporting on CENTCOM's statement that USS Carney shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile and three one-way attack unmanned aerial systems launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m., the author does not provide any information about CENTCOM's reputation or reliability, making it difficult for readers to determine whether this statement is accurate or trustworthy.
There are several instances where the author uses language that implies a moral superiority of US forces over Houthi rebels and their actions. For example, when reporting on USS Carney taking 'self-defense' strikes against Houthi projectiles posed to launch at commercial ships in the Red Sea, the author does not provide any context or analysis about whether these actions were necessary or proportionate given the circumstances.
U.S. Navy destroyer USS Carney shot down drones and a missile launched by Yemen's Houthi rebels toward the vessel in the Red Sea
Iran announced it is seizing oil cargo destined for Chevron Iran, which is backed by the Houthis
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it claims that the Houthi rebels targeted two American warships with bomb-carrying drones and one anti-ship ballistic missile when they attacked the USS Carney. However, this information was not provided by any official source or eyewitness account. Secondly, the article reports on an unspecified incident in which a British military center reported an explosion near a vessel 57 nautical miles south of Aden without providing any details about what happened or who was involved. Thirdly, the article quotes Iranian officials claiming that they will confiscate $50 million worth of Kuwaiti crude oil destined for Chevron Corp., but it does not provide any evidence to support this claim. Finally, the article reports on a court order issued by an unspecified authority ordering the seizure of the Advantage Sweet tanker in April 2023 without providing any details about why or how Iranian commandos were able to seize it.
The Houthi rebels targeted two American warships with bomb-carrying drones and one anti-ship ballistic missile when they attacked the USS Carney. However, this information was not provided by any official source or eyewitness account.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the Houthi rebels are attacking American warships in response to Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza Strip without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Iran is supporting Houthi militants or it is seizing oil cargo destined for Chevron Corp., which oversimplifies complex geopolitical issues in the region. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when describing the Houthis as
The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the Houthi rebels are attacking American warships in response to Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza Strip without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either Iran is supporting Houthi militants or it is seizing oil cargo destined for Chevron Corp., which oversimplifies complex geopolitical issues in the region.
The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when describing the Houthis as 'Iran-backed Yemeni rebels' without providing any evidence to support this claim.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author is not explicitly stated and the site does not provide any context for their reputation or political leanings. However, the content of the article clearly supports a particular narrative that portrays Iran as an aggressive actor in the region who is seizing oil shipments destined for American companies. This narrative is presented without any counter-arguments or alternative perspectives, which creates a one-sided view of events.
Despite more than a month and a half of U.S.-led airstrikes, Houthi rebels have remained capable of launching significant attacks.
Iran says it's seizing oil cargo destined for Chevron Iran
The Advantage Sweet had been in the Persian Gulf in late April, but its track showed no unusual behavior as it transited through the Strait of Hormuz, where a fifth of all traded oil passes.
On March 5, between the hours of 3 p.m. and 5 p.m (Sanaa time), U.S.
Later between
The missiles and USVs were located in Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile and three one-way attack unmanned aerial systems launched from Iranian-backed Houthi controlled areas of Yemen toward USS Carney (DDG 64). However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or sources. Secondly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when stating that these actions are taken to protect freedom of navigation and make international waters safer and more secure for U.S. Navy and merchant vessels.
U.S Central Command (CENTCOM) forces shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile
These actions are taken to protect freedom of navigation
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that implies the Houthi rebels are responsible for launching missiles and unmanned vehicles at USS Carney. This is an example of religious bias as it assumes that all Muslims support the actions of extremist groups like the Houthis.
Later between 8:45 p.m. and 9:40 p.m., CENTCOM forces destroyed three anti-ship missiles and three unmanned surface vessels(USV) in self-defense.
> U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces shot down one anti-ship ballistic missile and three one-way attack unmanned aerial systems launched from Iranian-backed Houthi controlled areas of Yemen toward USS Carney (DDG 64) in the Red Sea.
