US Allows Ukraine to Use American-Supplied Weapons Against Russian Targets Near Kharkiv

Includes American-made air defense systems, guided rockets, and artillery
Ukraine given permission to use US weapons for self-defense along northeastern border
US allows Ukraine to use American-supplied weapons against Russian targets near Kharkiv
US Allows Ukraine to Use American-Supplied Weapons Against Russian Targets Near Kharkiv

In a significant shift in policy, US President Joe Biden has given Ukraine permission to use American-supplied weapons to strike targets near the Kharkiv region of Russia. This decision comes after weeks of intense fighting between Ukrainian and Russian forces in the area, resulting in civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure.

According to reports from multiple sources, including the BBC and The New York Times, Ukraine has been given permission to use US weapons for self-defense along the border with Russia. This includes American-made air defense systems, guided rockets, and artillery. However, it is important to note that this policy only applies to the northeastern border of Ukraine near Kharkiv.

The decision marks a departure from previous US policy which had prohibited the use of American weapons inside Russian territory due to concerns over escalation. The shift in policy was reportedly driven by Ukraine's urgent need to defend itself against Russian attacks, particularly in the Kharkiv region where fighting has been intense.

The UK and Germany have also signaled their support for Ukraine's use of Western-supplied weapons inside Russia, although the scope and extent of this support are not yet clear.

Russian officials have condemned the decision, warning of



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Is the use of American weapons inside Russian territory a departure from previous US policy?
  • What is the extent of UK and Germany's support for Ukraine's use of Western-supplied weapons?

Sources

98%

  • Unique Points
    • US President Joe Biden has given Ukraine permission to use American-supplied weapons to strike targets in Russia, but only near the Kharkiv region.
    • Ukraine can use US weapons for self-defense along the border with Russia near Kharkiv.
  • Accuracy
    • , The US amended its policy on May 31, 2024 to allow Ukraine to use American air defense systems, guided rockets and artillery along the border with Russia near Kharkiv.
    • Ukraine has the right to strike at targets inside Russia using weapons supplied by Germany and its western allies.
    • United States President Joe Biden has eased a ban on Ukraine using US weapons inside Russian territory
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

97%

  • Unique Points
    • Ukraine won permission from the US to hit targets inside Russia with American-made weapons
    • This is the first time an American president has allowed limited use of American weapons to strike inside the borders of a nuclear-armed adversary
  • Accuracy
    • US President Joe Biden has given Ukraine permission to use American-supplied weapons to strike targets in Russia, but only near the Kharkiv region.
    • Germany has confirmed that Ukraine has the right to strike at targets inside Russia using weapons supplied by Germany and its western allies.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority when it states 'It appeared to be the first time an American president had allowed the limited use of American weapons to strike inside the borders of a nuclear-armed adversary.' This statement implies that the historical significance of this event is enough justification for Ukraine's actions, without providing any logical argument or evidence. However, since there are no other fallacies found in the article and only one minor example provided, the score remains high.
    • It appeared to be the first time an American president had allowed the limited use of American weapons to strike inside the borders of a nuclear-armed adversary.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

95%

  • Unique Points
    • Germany has confirmed that Ukraine has the right to strike at targets inside Russia using weapons supplied by Germany and its western allies.
    • Ukraine won permission from the US to hit targets inside Russia with American-made weapons
  • Accuracy
    • Ukraine can use US weapons for
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

80%

  • Unique Points
    • United States President Joe Biden has eased a ban on Ukraine using US weapons inside Russian territory to help the country defend its northeastern Kharkiv region from attack.
    • Kyiv will be allowed to use the weapons on the border of the Kharkiv region, where Russia has overrun a number of villages since May 10, forcing the evacuation of thousands of residents.
  • Accuracy
    • United States President Joe Biden has eased a ban on Ukraine using US weapons inside Russian territory
    • Ukraine can use US weapons for defending its northeastern region of Kharkiv
    • US President Biden has given Ukraine permission to use American-supplied weapons to strike targets in Russia, but only near the Kharkiv region
  • Deception (30%)
    The article reports on the US easing restrictions on Ukraine's use of US weapons inside Russian territory. The author uses emotional manipulation by stating that 'several US officials' told multiple media outlets 'that Kyiv would be allowed to use the weapons on the border of the Kharkiv region, where Russia has overrun a number of villages since May 10, forcing the evacuation of thousands of residents.' This is an attempt to elicit an emotional response from readers. The author also uses selective reporting by only mentioning details that support their position and omitting information that contradicts it. For example, the article states 'The US decision, which has predictably angered Kremlin officials,' but fails to mention that this decision was made in response to renewed Russian attacks on Ukraine's Kharkiv region. The author also uses sensationalism by stating 'Russia will retaliate asymmetrically to Ukrainian attacks on its territory using weapons provided by the US.' This statement is not backed up by any evidence and is intended to grab the reader's attention.
    • The US decision, which has predictably angered Kremlin officials,
    • Russia will retaliate asymmetrically to Ukrainian attacks on its territory using weapons provided by the US.
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The author makes several appeals to authority by quoting multiple unnamed US officials and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the Russian actions as 'attacks' and 'overrunning villages', but does not provide any evidence or context for these claims. However, no formal fallacies or dichotomous depictions were found.
    • ]The president recently directed his team to ensure that Ukraine is able to use US-supplied weapons for counter-fire purposes in the Kharkiv region so Ukraine can hit back against Russian forces that are attacking them or preparing to attack them.[/
    • Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been urging Kyiv's allies to allow it to use their longer-range weaponry to hit targets on Russian soil amid a surge in attacks this month.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication