Vatican Updates Guidelines for Evaluating Supernatural Phenomena: A Balance Between Devotion and Skepticism

Vatican City, Vatican City Italy
Bishops instructed to assess each reported phenomenon carefully and consider whether it can be ascertained as a sign of divine action, evaluate conflicts with faith and morals, spiritual fruits, pastoral value
New rules aim to provide clear procedures for bishops to investigate and potentially reject reports of alleged miraculous events while respecting popular devotion
Six possible conclusions: Nihil Obstat, Prae oculis habeatur, Curatur, Sub mandato, Prohibetur et obstruatur, Declaratio de non supernaturalitate
Vatican has a long history of evaluating such claims with notable examples including those at Fatima, Lourdes and Medjugorje
Vatican takes action against groups that make false claims or attempt to manipulate people's beliefs for personal gain
Vatican updates guidelines for evaluating supernatural phenomena
Vatican Updates Guidelines for Evaluating Supernatural Phenomena: A Balance Between Devotion and Skepticism

The Vatican has recently updated its guidelines for evaluating supernatural phenomena, such as visions of the Virgin Mary and weeping statues, for the first time since 1978. The new rules aim to provide clear procedures for bishops to investigate and potentially reject reports of alleged miraculous events while respecting popular devotion. These changes come in response to the increasing spread of unverified claims through social media and the need to protect the faithful from potential hoaxers.

Under these new norms, bishops are instructed to assess each reported phenomenon carefully and consider whether it can be ascertained as a sign of divine action. They must also evaluate whether there is anything that conflicts with faith and morals, if spiritual fruits need to be purified from problematic elements or warned about potential risks, and if it is advisable for the competent ecclesiastical authority to realize pastoral value.

The discernment of an alleged supernatural phenomenon may reach six conclusions: Nihil Obstat (no objection), Prae oculis habeatur (to be kept under observation), Curatur (to be taken care of), Sub mandato (under the authority of a higher ecclesiastical instance), Prohibetur et obstruatur (to be prohibited and obstructed), and Declaratio de non supernaturalitate (declaration of non-supernaturality).

It is important to note that neither the local bishop nor the Holy See will declare that these phenomena are of supernatural origin, but they may authorize and promote devotion and pilgrimages if deemed appropriate.

The Vatican has a long history of evaluating such claims, with notable examples including those at Fatima, Portugal; Lourdes, France; and Medjugorje in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Despite the new criteria, past decision-making on alleged supernatural events remains valid.

The Vatican has also taken action against groups that have made false claims or attempted to manipulate people's beliefs for personal gain. For instance, it excommunicated members of a Quebec-based group, the Army of Mary, after their foundress claimed to have had Marian visions and declared herself the reincarnation of the mother of Christ.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Are there any potential conflicts of interest or biases among the bishops evaluating these phenomena?
  • How will the Vatican determine whether a phenomenon is a sign of divine action versus a natural occurrence?
  • What criteria will be used to evaluate spiritual fruits and pastoral value?

Sources

94%

  • Unique Points
    • The Vatican has overhauled norms for evaluating alleged visions of the Virgin Mary and other seemingly supernatural phenomena due to their being no longer useful or viable in the internet age.
    • The new norms put the brakes on making definitive declarations unless the event is obviously fabricated, as word about apparitions or weeping Madonnas travels quickly and can harm the faithful if hoaxers are trying to make money off people’s beliefs or manipulate them.
    • Despite new criteria, past decision-making on alleged supernatural events such as at Fatima, Guadalupe or Lourdes remains valid.
    • The Vatican excommunicated members of a Quebec-based group, the Army of Mary, after its foundress claimed to have had Marian visions and declared herself the reincarnation of the mother of Christ.
  • Accuracy
    • The new norms put the brakes on making definitive declarations unless the event is obviously fabricated, as word about apparitions or weeping Madonnas travels quickly and can harm the faithful if hoaxers are trying to make money off people’s beliefs or manipulate them.
    • Despite new criteria, past decision-making on alleged supernatural events such as at Fatima, Guadalupe or Lourdes remains valid.
  • Deception (80%)
    The article provides a clear explanation of the Vatican's new norms for evaluating alleged visions and other seemingly supernatural phenomena. It does not contain any editorializing or author opinions, but rather reports on the Vatican's actions and statements. The article also discloses sources, including quotes from Cardinal Fernández and Neomi De Anda. However, the article does use emotional manipulation by describing how hoaxers can harm the faithful and manipulate them. It also uses selective reporting by focusing on the negative aspects of past apparitions and their potential for abuse.
    • The Vatican's new norms make clear that such an abuse of people's faith can be punishable canonically, saying,
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article does not contain any explicit logical fallacies. However, there are some instances of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority that should be noted. The author uses the term 'hoaxers' to describe individuals who manipulate people's beliefs for personal gain, implying that they are deceitful and untrustworthy. This language is inflammatory and could be perceived as biased. Additionally, the article quotes Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández stating that the church gives the faithful 'the freedom to pay attention' or not to believed reported apparitions. This statement can be seen as an appeal to authority, as it implies that the church has expertise in evaluating supernatural phenomena and therefore its opinions should be trusted.
    • ]The Vatican's doctrine office overhauled norms first issued in 1978, arguing that they were no longer useful or viable in the internet age. Nowadays, word about apparitions or weeping Madonnas travels quickly and can actually harm the faithful if hoaxers are trying to make money off people's beliefs or manipulate them,
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

96%

  • Unique Points
    • The Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith has issued new guidelines for evaluating faith-based phenomena.
    • Bishops can completely reject an event as supernatural and take steps to ban or limit worship of fake or controversial phenomena.
    • Clear procedures are needed but not intended to control or stifle the Holy Spirit.
    • Pope Francis has expressed skepticism about some supernatural phenomena and prefers to see Mary as pointing to Jesus rather than drawing attention to herself.
  • Accuracy
    • The Vatican's Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith has issued new guidelines for evaluating faith-based phenomena.
    • The document does not include the possibility of declaring that a phenomenon is of supernatural origin, meaning church authorities will no longer declare whether a vision or stigmata is divinely inspired.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The article discusses the Vatican's new guidelines for evaluating supernatural phenomena and mentions some controversial past examples. The author expresses skepticism towards more recent apparitions and quotes Pope Francis' statements on the matter. This creates a subtle tone of dismissal towards these phenomena, which could be seen as an expression of ideological bias against religious beliefs.
    • However, he has made it clear that he is devoted to older Marian apparitions approved by the church like Our Lady of Guadalupe.
      • I prefer the Madonna as mother, our mother, and not a woman who’s the head of a telegraphic office, who sends a message every day at a certain time.
        • It came to the decision after the convent prioress confessed to having participated in a deception and some of her nuns testified that they had seen deliveries of roses to the convent.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        96%

        • Unique Points
          • The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith has updated the norms for discerning alleged supernatural phenomena.
          • Many cases in recent decades have involved interventions from former Holy Office, but decisions remained behind the scenes and were never made public.
          • The new norms allow for faster decisions while respecting popular devotion.
          • The Church will exercise her duties of discernment based on whether signs of divine action can be ascertained, whether there is anything that conflicts with faith and morals, whether spiritual fruits need to be purified from problematic elements or warned about potential risks, and whether it is advisable for the competent ecclesiastical authority to realize pastoral value.
          • The discernment of an alleged supernatural phenomenon may reach six conclusions: Nihil Obstat, Prae oculis habeatur, Curatur, Sub mandato, Prohibetur et obstruatur, and Declaratio de non supernaturalitate.
        • Accuracy
          • The Church’s authority will no longer engage to officially define the supernatural nature of a phenomenon.
          • Despite new criteria, past decision-making on alleged supernatural events such as at Fatima, Guadalupe or Lourdes remains valid.
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (90%)
          The article provides a clear and detailed explanation of the new norms regarding alleged supernatural phenomena. It does not contain any inflammatory rhetoric or appeals to authority. There are no dichotomous depictions present in the text. However, there are some examples of informal fallacies, specifically in the section outlining negative criteria for evaluating alleged supernatural phenomena. The author presents these criteria as definitive characteristics that must be considered when assessing such phenomena, which is an overgeneralization and oversimplification of the evaluation process. This leads to a score deduction of 10%.
          • The document originates from the long experience of the last century...
          • There may be ... believers being misled by an event that is attributed to a divine initiative but is merely the product of someone's imagination, desire for novelty, tendency to fabricate falsehoods (mythomania), or inclination toward lying.
          • The author presents these criteria as definitive characteristics that must be considered when assessing such phenomena...
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        100%

        • Unique Points
          • The Vatican has revamped its process for evaluating supernatural claims for the first time since 1978.
          • New guidelines reveal radical reforms in the Vatican’s approach to seemingly supernatural phenomena.
          • Bishops will use strengthened criteria to investigate and possibly reject reports of alleged miraculous events, with Vatican approval required before ruling on validity.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication