Venezuela's Contested Presidential Election: Edmundo Gonzalez Claims Victory Over Nicolas Maduro with Over 60% of Tabulated Votes

Caracas, Venezuela Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Edmundo Gonzalez is a former diplomat and political newcomer who served as Venezuela's ambassador to Argentina during Hugo Chavez's government.
Maduro faces drug trafficking and corruption charges in the US, under investigation for crimes against humanity by International Criminal Court.
Maduro was officially declared the winner by the National Electoral Council, but opposition rejected his win and organized protests.
Opposition leader María Corina Machado claims Edmundo Gonzalez received over 60% of votes with over 70% of tabulations.
Venezuela held a contentious presidential election on July 29, 2024.
Venezuela's Contested Presidential Election: Edmundo Gonzalez Claims Victory Over Nicolas Maduro with Over 60% of Tabulated Votes

Venezuela experienced a contentious presidential election on July 29, 2024, with opposition leader María Corina Machado claiming that her candidate, Edmundo Gonzalez, had won the race based on their tabulated data. According to various sources,

María Corina Machado and her team have over 70% of the voting tabulations from Venezuela's election. They allege that Edmundo Gonzalez received 6.2 million votes compared to President Nicolás Maduro's 2.8 million.

Gonzalez, a former diplomat and political newcomer, began his professional career as an aide to Venezuela's ambassador in the US and had postings in Belgium, El Salvador, and Algeria. He served as Venezuela's ambassador to Argentina during the first years of Hugo Chavez's government.

Despite these claims, Maduro was officially declared the winner by the National Electoral Council (CNE). The opposition coalition rejected his win and organized protests in several cities, including Caracas. Protesters were met with tear gas and armed groups reportedly shot at peaceful demonstrators.

Maduro faces drug trafficking and corruption charges in the US and is under investigation for crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court.

The election was a significant event as it marked the first serious electoral challenge to Maduro's ruling party in decades. The outcome remains uncertain, with both sides claiming victory.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • The accuracy of tabulated data from María Corina Machado's team.
  • The official winner declared by the National Electoral Council and its legitimacy.

Sources

98%

  • Unique Points
    • María Corina Machado claims opposition has over 70% of voting tabulations from Venezuela’s election.
    • Opposition alleges they have proof that Edmundo Gonzalez won the election with 6.2 million votes.
    • President Nicolás Maduro received 2.8 million votes according to the opposition’s data.
  • Accuracy
    • Jorge Rodriguez, a deputy of the National Assembly of Venezuela, said the latest CNE results showed Maduro in the lead with 51.2% of the votes.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

74%

  • Unique Points
    • Protests erupted in Venezuela after authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro was declared the winner of the presidential race.
    • The opposition coalition, led by Maria Corina Machado, rejected Maduro’s win and claimed their campaign had gathered enough vote tallies to prove their candidate, Edmundo Gonzalez, had won.
    • Maduro faces drug trafficking and corruption charges in the US and is under investigation for crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court.
  • Accuracy
    • President Nicolás Maduro received 2.8 million votes according to the opposition’s data.
    • Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia is a Venezuelan political newcomer and former diplomat running for president against Nicolas Maduro in the upcoming election.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains several instances of selective reporting and sensationalism. The author focuses on the protests and violence that occurred after the election, while downplaying or omitting information about the allegations of electoral fraud made by the opposition. For example, they mention that 'The opposition said its witnesses were denied access to the National Electoral Council (CNE) headquarters as votes were being counted,' but do not provide any details about this allegation or its significance. They also quote Machado and Gonzalez making claims about having obtained a majority of the vote tallies, but do not mention that these claims have not been verified by any independent sources. Additionally, the article sensationalizes the situation by using phrases like 'authoritarian leader' and 'strongman Maduro,' which are loaded terms that imply a negative assessment of Maduro without providing any evidence to support this characterization.
    • The opposition said its witnesses were denied access to the National Electoral Council (CNE) headquarters as votes were being counted,
    • Maduro said his government ‘knows how to confront this situation and defeat those who are violent,’ claiming without evidence that the majority of the protestors were hate-filled criminals – and that their plan was hatched in the United States.
    • Protests broke out in several Venezuelan cities on Monday after authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro was formally declared a winner by the county’s electoral authority in a presidential race marred by accusations of electoral fraud.
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The article contains some inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority, but overall it does not contain a significant number of formal or informal fallacies that would drop the score below 80. The author quotes various sources and provides context for the situation in Venezuela. However, there are instances where the author's assertions cannot be separated from those they are quoting, which may lead to some confusion.
    • Maduro said without evidence that the majority of protestors were hate-filled criminals and claimed that their plan was hatched in the United States.
    • The Carter Center has a big responsibility on their shoulders... It is the only international technical observation mission that can issue a public report on the results.
    • Venezuelan authorities have announced that flights from Panama and the Dominican Republic will be suspended from Wednesday 8 p.m.
  • Bias (80%)
    The author uses language that depicts Maduro's supporters as violent and hatched a plan in the United States without providing evidence. The author also mentions the expulsion of diplomatic staff from several countries and calls them 'right-wing Washington-subordinate governments', implying a political bias.
    • Maduro said his government 'knows how to confront this situation and defeat those who are violent.', claiming without evidence that the majority of the protestors were hate-filled criminals
      • The Venezuelan government, in turn, said it was expelling diplomatic staff from Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Peru, Panama, the Dominican Republic, and Uruguay, calling them 'right-wing Washington-subordinate governments'
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      92%

      • Unique Points
        • María Corina Machado traveled to a village called Corozo Pando in May and ordered meals at a restaurant called Pancho Grill.
        • María Corina Machado faced repression during her campaign cycle.
      • Accuracy
        • ,
      • Deception (80%)
        The article contains selective reporting as the author only reports details that support the opposition's position and does not mention any counterarguments or evidence from the government. The author also uses emotional manipulation by describing Maduro as a 'widely hated autocrat' and 'a 25-year-old regime'. Additionally, there is a lie by omission as the author fails to mention that international election observers did not find any evidence of widespread fraud in the election.
        • Maduro, a widely hated autocrat whose economic mismanagement has produced one of the world’s biggest refugee crises, appears to have secured less than half as many votes as his opponent, but is to govern for a third term.
        • The government has declared a narrow victory for President Nicolás Maduro but will not release the detailed results, despite the calls of national and international election observers as well as foreign leaders.
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      89%

      • Unique Points
        • Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia is a Venezuelan political newcomer and former diplomat running for president against Nicolas Maduro in the upcoming election.
        • Gonzalez began his professional career as an aide to Venezuela’s ambassador in the US and had postings in Belgium, El Salvador, and Algeria.
        • He served as Venezuela’s ambassador to Argentina during the first years of Hugo Chavez’s government.
        • Gonzalez has emphasized decency and an end to shouting and insults as key issues in his campaign.
      • Accuracy
        • Edmundo Gonzalez won the election with 6.2 million votes.
        • President Nicolás Maduro received 2.8 million votes.
        • Protests erupted in Venezuela after authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro was declared the winner of the presidential race.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (95%)
        The article contains some instances of appeals to authority and inflammatory rhetoric, but no formal or dichotomous fallacies are present. The author describes Gonzalez's background as a diplomat and his experiences in El Salvador and Algeria during periods of armed conflict. This information is presented as evidence of Gonzalez's character and qualifications for the presidency, making it an appeal to authority. Additionally, the article uses inflammatory language to describe Maduro's actions towards Gonzalez, such as
        • Maduro and his allies have taken his demeanor as a sign of weakness and chastised him on national TV and at campaign events.
        • That kind of demeaning language is among the many changes Gonzalez wishes to see in Venezuela.
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication