Deja Taylor, a Virginia mother, has been sentenced to 21 months in prison for using marijuana while owning a firearm.
Her 6-year-old son took her handgun to school and shot his teacher, Abby Zwerner, seriously wounding her.
Taylor was convicted of using marijuana while owning a gun and lying about her drug use on a federal form when she bought the gun.
Deja Taylor, a Virginia mother, has been sentenced to 21 months in prison for using marijuana while owning a firearm, an act that is illegal under U.S. law. This sentence comes in the wake of an incident where her 6-year-old son took her handgun to school and shot his teacher, Abby Zwerner, seriously wounding her. The incident has sparked a debate on the intersection of drug use and gun ownership, particularly in states like Virginia where marijuana use is legal.
The boy had taken Taylor's handgun to school and shot his teacher, Abby Zwerner, in her first-grade classroom. Zwerner was seriously wounded in her hand and chest. Investigators found nearly an ounce of marijuana in Taylor's bedroom and evidence of frequent drug use in her text messages and paraphernalia.
Taylor was convicted of using marijuana while owning a gun and lying about her drug use on a federal form when she bought the gun. Federal prosecutors in Virginia sought a 21-month prison sentence, which was granted. This sentencing is the first measure of accountability for the shooting incident.
The case of Deja Taylor comes at a time when marijuana is legal in many states, including Virginia, while many Americans own firearms. This incident has brought to light the legal complexities and potential dangers that can arise when these two issues intersect.
Confidence
100%
No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication
Sources
95%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The teacher, Abigail Zwerner, was wounded in her hand and chest.
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
91%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(90%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
96%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Taylor's sentencing is the first measure of accountability for the shooting incident.
Taylor's case comes at a time when marijuana is legal in many states, including Virginia, while many Americans own firearms.
Taylor was convicted of using marijuana while owning a gun and lying about her drug use on a federal form when she bought the gun.
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
95%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Federal prosecutors in Virginia are seeking a 21-month prison sentence.
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
94%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Accuracy No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication