The diagnosis was made in 2023 by her care team after she had already stopped hosting her daytime talk show in 2021.
Wendy Williams has been diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia.
Wendy Williams, a popular talk show host and media personality, has been diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. The diagnosis was made in 2023 by her care team after she had already stopped hosting her daytime talk show in 2021. Despite this news, Williams is listed as an executive producer on the upcoming documentary about herself titled 'Where Is Wendy Williams?' which will air on Lifetime over two nights starting Saturday at 8 p.m.
The Wendy Williams Show was taken off air in 2022, almost two years before Wendy williams was diagnosed with aphasia and dementia.
Wendy is listed as an executive producer on the documentary.
Accuracy
Wendy Williams attends The Morning Show premiere in 2019. Photo: Roy Rochlin/WireImage
The Wendy Williams Show aired 13 seasons over 14 years and ultimately concluded in 2022 without Wendy on screen.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that Wendy Williams will still air this weekend despite a legal guardian filing a lawsuit against Lifetime's parent company to prevent it from doing so. However, upon reading further into the article, we learn that Lifetime appeared in court and won their case to allow the documentary 'Where is Wendy Williams?' to air as planned on Saturday and Sunday. This contradicts the title of the article which implies a different outcome for Wendy Williams' documentary.
Lifetime appeared in court and won their case to allow 'Where is Wendy Williams?' to air as planned on Saturday and Sunday.
The title of the article implies that Wendy will still air this weekend despite legal guardian filing lawsuit against Lifetime
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from Wendy Williams' legal guardian who filed a lawsuit against Lifetime to prevent the documentary 'Where Is Wendy Williams?' from airing. The guardian is asking for a temporary restraining order to halt the documentary's release. This indicates that there may be some bias in the decision-making process of the court and/or legal system, which could affect whether or not Williams has control over her own narrative.
Lifetime declined to comment on the contents of the lawsuit.
The court-assigned guardian for Wendy Williams failed in their attempt to prevent a revealing documentary about the former talk-show host from airing on Lifetime this weekend
The Wendy Williams Show was taken off air in 2022, almost two years before Wendy williams was diagnosed with aphasia and dementia.
Wendy is listed as an executive producer on the documentary detailing her life and recent years off screen.
Two days before a major documentary chronicling Wendy Williams' deteriorating mental state is scheduled to premiere on Lifetime, the beleaguered former talk show host's court-appointed caregiver filed a lawsuit against Lifetime parent company Aʾ Networks.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in that it implies Wendy Williams was not aware of the cancellation of her talk show. However, the article quotes her niece stating that she explained to Wendy that The Wendy Williams Show had been removed from air and it took a little bit of convincing for her to understand.
The article states 'Wendy Williams attends The Morning Show premiere in 2019. Photo: Roy Rochlin/WireImage' which implies that Wendy was still hosting the show at the time, but it had already been cancelled for two years.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that Wendy Williams attends The Morning Show premiere in 2019. This is not a factual statement and should be corrected.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from Wendy Williams' niece that suggests the host struggled to understand her talk show was canceled. This is an example of bias because it implies that Williams may not be fully aware or capable of understanding what happened on her own show.
> It took a little bit of convincing and conversations with the powers that be from her show for her to really understand that the show is no more.
The Wendy Williams Show was taken off air in 2022, almost two years before Wendy williams was diagnosed with aphasia and dementia.
Wendy Williams attends The Morning Show premiere in 2019. Photo: Roy Rochlin/WireImage
The Wendy Williams Show aired 13 seasons over 14 years and ultimately concluded in 2022 without Wendy on screen.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that Wendy Williams has gone missing when she hasn't. Secondly, Lifetime claims to have a documentary about where Wendy Williams is but it was filmed before her diagnosis and therefore cannot be accurate or up-to-date. Thirdly, some family members claim they don't know where she is which contradicts the fact that Wendy has been diagnosed with dementia and can call them. Lastly, People magazine reports on a documentary crew filming Wendy in 2023 but it was stopped when her cognitive issues were discovered. This implies that the documentary may not be accurate or up-to-date.
The title of the article is misleading and implies that Wendy Williams has gone missing.
Lifetime claims to have a documentary about where Wendy Williams is but it was filmed before her diagnosis and therefore cannot be accurate or up-to-date.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the diagnosis was made by Wendy Williams' care team and citing a court order as evidence of its validity. However, this does not necessarily mean that the diagnosis is accurate or reliable without further information about her condition.
The article states:
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts Wendy Williams as a victim who is being targeted by her former employer for financial gain.
<u0022Let me say, wow! Your response has been overwhelming.<br>-The use of the word 'overwhelming' implies an emotional response rather than factual reporting. This could be seen as religious bias, as it suggests that Wendy is being supported by her fans and loved ones who are praying for her recovery.
<u0022the former host has been diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia.<br>-The use of the phrase 'primary progressive' implies an emphasis on the severity of Wendy's condition, which could be seen as monetary bias. This is because it suggests that Lifetime is trying to profit off of Wendy's illness.
>Wendy Williams has been overwhelmed with support since sharing that she was diagnosed with a neurological condition.<br>-The use of the phrase 'overwhelmed' implies an emotional response rather than factual reporting. This could be seen as religious bias, as it suggests that Wendy is being supported by her fans and loved ones who are praying for her recovery.
Wendy Williams was diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia in 2023 according to her care team statement.
The Wendy Williams Show was taken off air in 2022, almost two years before Wendy williams was diagnosed with aphasia and dementia.
Accuracy
Wendy is listed as an executive producer on the two-night special.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that Wendy Williams' guardian has sued Lifetime for a documentary about her mental state. However, this is not entirely accurate as Morrissey only filed a lawsuit against A+E Networks and Entertainment One Reality Productions for injunctive relief to stop the airing of the documentary. Secondly, the article states that Williams has been diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia, Graves' disease, lymphedema, and alcohol addiction. However, it does not provide any evidence or sources for these claims. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalism by stating that Williams is in a facility under Morrissey's care today and is still unreachable by anyone other than her family members.
The title of the article implies that Wendy Williams' guardian has sued Lifetime for a documentary about her mental state. However, this is not entirely accurate as Morrissey only filed a lawsuit against A+E Networks and Entertainment One Reality Productions for injunctive relief to stop the airing of the documentary.
The article states that Williams has been diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia, Graves' disease, lymphedema, and alcohol addiction. However, it does not provide any evidence or sources for these claims.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that Wendy Williams has been diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. This statement assumes that the diagnosis made by her representatives is accurate without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
Wendy Williams has been diagnosed with primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Wendy Williams by describing her as a 'former shock jock turned daytime sensation' and then goes on to describe her health issues in detail which could be seen as exploitative.
Morrissey — whose identity as the individual appointed by the court in 2022 to look after Williams had been unknown publicly and to Williams’ family — is “acting in her capacity as Temporary Guardian.”
On Friday, Appellate Justice Peter H. Moulton vacated a temporary restraining order signed ex parte.
The complaint, which sought a temporary restraining order, names A+E Networks, the parent company of Lifetime.
. . . the former talk show host’s court-appointed caregiver filed a lawsuit against Lifetime parent company A+E Networks.
The production crew began to follow the former host of The Wendy Williams Show in late August 2022, but given her physical and mental state, the focus pivoted to her struggles with addiction and autoimmune disorders.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author has a financial stake in the company being reported on as they work for A+E Networks, which is also the parent company of Lifetime. Additionally, there is no disclosure about any potential conflicts of interest.
The author works for A+E Networks, which owns Lifetime and is being sued in this article.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Wendy Williams and her documentary 'Where Is Wendy Williams?' which is produced by Entertainment One Reality Productions. This company is also a subsidiary of A+E Networks, which owns Lifetime, another topic discussed in the article.
The article discusses Wendy Williams and her documentary 'Where Is Wendy Williams?' which is produced by Entertainment One Reality Productions. This company is also a subsidiary of A+E Networks, which owns Lifetime, another topic discussed in the article.
The author mentions that Graves' disease was one of the topics covered in 'Where Is Wendy Williams?' and notes that it is a condition associated with lymphedema. The article also discusses A+E Networks as being involved with both Lifetime and Entertainment One Reality Productions.
Wendy Williams did not realize she was filming a documentary in her dementia struggle as the Lifetime series is set to air this weekend.
The Wendy Williams Show was taken off air in 2022, almost two years before Wendy williams was diagnosed with aphasia and dementia.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, Wendy Williams did not realize she was filming a documentary while she believed it to be podcast promotions. This shows that the author of the article misrepresented what Wendy thought she was doing during her filming sessions, which could have been done intentionally for sensationalism or selective reporting purposes.
Wendy Williams did not realize she was filming a documentary while believing it to be podcast promotions.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author seems to be using anecdotal evidence and personal opinions to make claims about Wendy Williams's dementia struggle without providing any concrete evidence or medical diagnosis. Additionally, the use of quotes from unnamed sources creates a lack of credibility in the information presented.
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author is not transparent about the documentary's purpose and Wendy Williams does not seem to understand that she was filming a documentary. Additionally, there are conflicting statements from sources regarding whether or not Wendy knew what she was filming for and if her wig was on in certain scenes.
Another claimed that they were misled into believing what they filmed had something to do with her apparently never-to-materialize podcast
One source said that Wendy would have never allowed herself to be filmed without her wig on (in this scene with TV star Blac Chyna)
She believed she was filming podcast promotions at times but seemed to understand this wasn't for the documentary
Wendy did not realize she was filming a documentary
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Jessica Finn has a conflict of interest on the topics of Wendy Williams and Lifetime as she is an employee of The Sun which owns Lifetime. She also has a personal relationship with Blac Chyna who was featured in her documentary.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Jessica Finn has a conflict of interest on the topics of Wendy Williams and Lifetime series as she is an author for The Sun which covers both topics.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(669x238:671x240)/wendy-williams-red-carpet-2-022224-55543081d6d044b1bac93db88da3e550.jpg)
