West African Leaders Form New Confederation, Aim for Political and Economic Integration Amidst French and US Disengagement

Burkina Faso's leader, Captain Ibrahim Traore, criticized Western countries for exploiting Africa and promised to consolidate cooperation among AES members to quell violence in the Sahel region.
Mali's Colonel Assimi Goita echoed Tchiani's sentiments and highlighted the need for security cooperation to combat armed groups linked to al-Qaeda and ISIL in the region.
Niger's military leader, General Abdourahmane Tchiani, described ECOWAS as a threat and ruled out rejoining the organization. He emphasized the importance of African values in building a community of peace within the AES.
The AES is intended to be an alternative to the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), which the juntas have accused of being manipulated by foreign powers.
West African military leaders from Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso have formed a new confederation called the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) for political and economic integration.
West African Leaders Form New Confederation, Aim for Political and Economic Integration Amidst French and US Disengagement

West African military leaders from Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso have formed a new confederation aimed at political and economic integration. The move comes after the juntas independently cut military ties with France and the US, and reinforced cooperation with Russia, Iran, and Turkey following military takeovers.

The leaders of these countries met in Niamey on July 6 to sign a treaty establishing the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). The AES is intended to be an alternative to the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), which the juntas have accused of being manipulated by foreign powers.

Burkina Faso's leader, Captain Ibrahim Traore, criticized Western countries for exploiting Africa and its resources. He also promised to consolidate cooperation among the AES members to quell violence in the Sahel region, where more than 24 million people require assistance due to Islamist insurgency.

Niger's military leader, General Abdourahmane Tchiani, described ECOWAS as a threat to their states and ruled out rejoining the organization. He also emphasized the importance of African values in building a community of peace, solidarity, and prosperity within the AES.

Mali's Colonel Assimi Goita echoed Tchiani's sentiments, stating that an attack on one member would be considered an attack on all members. He also highlighted the need for security cooperation to combat armed groups linked to al-Qaeda and ISIL in the region.

The AES leaders have pursued closer ties with Russia as part of their efforts to reduce dependence on Western powers. However, it remains unclear whether this approach has helped stem the violence in their countries.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • It is unclear how the AES will address the root causes of violence in the Sahel region.
  • The impact of closer ties with Russia on reducing violence in these countries remains uncertain.

Sources

77%

  • Unique Points
    • The military leaders of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger signed a confederation treaty in Niamey on Saturday to strengthen their mutual defence pact, the Alliance of Sahel States (AES).
    • Nigeria’s General Abdourahmane Tchiani called ECOWAS a ‘threat to our states’.
    • Mali’s Colonel Assimi Goita said an ‘attack on one of us will be an attack on all the other members’.
    • Armed groups linked to al-Qaeda and ISIL have jockeyed for control of territory in all three countries, causing waves of violence and concern in Western capitals.
    • The military leaders have increasingly pursued security and economic ties with Russia, but it remains unclear if this approach has helped to stem the violence.
  • Accuracy
    • The leaders accused foreign powers, particularly former colonial ruler France, of seeking to exploit the countries.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author quotes the military leaders of Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger accusing foreign powers of exploitation and interference in their countries. However, the author does not provide any counterarguments or evidence to challenge these claims. This creates an emotionally charged narrative that may sway readers without providing a balanced perspective. Additionally, the article focuses on the military leaders' decision to withdraw from ECOWAS and form a new alliance while downplaying the violence and instability in their countries, which is a significant issue that warrants attention. The author also implies that ECOWAS has not performed well in achieving regional integration or ensuring security, but does not provide any evidence or context to support this claim.
    • Many people believe that the meeting in Niger was to counter whatever is coming [from] ECOWAS and to also outline their position: That they are not returning to the Economic Community of the West African States.
    • We are going to create an AES of the peoples, instead of an ECOWAS whose directives and instructions are dictated to it by powers that are foreign to Africa.
    • The West African economic bloc had suspended the three countries after their respective military takeovers, which occurred in July 2023 in Niger, September 2022 in Burkina Faso and August 2021 in Mali.
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority when quoting Adama Gaye, a political commentator and former ECOWAS communications director, who expresses doubts about the effectiveness of ECOWAS. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when quoting Burkina Faso's Captain Ibrahim Traore and Niger's General Abdourahmane Tchiani, who accuse foreign powers of exploiting their countries and considering them to belong to them. However, no formal fallacies or dichotomous depictions were found.
    • “We are going to create an AES of the peoples, instead of an ECOWAS whose directives and instructions are dictated to it by powers that are foreign to Africa,” Tchiani said.
    • “Westerners consider that we belong to them and our wealth also belongs to them. They think that they are the ones who must continue to tell us what is good for our states,” Traore also accused.
  • Bias (80%)
    The author, Al Jazeera, demonstrates religious and ideological bias by quoting the military leaders of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger accusing 'Westerners' of seeking to exploit their countries and considering ECOWAS a threat. The author also implies that Western powers are trying to dictate instructions to African states.
    • It also came just months after the three countries withdrew from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) regional bloc in January.
      • Many people believe that the meeting in Niger was to counter whatever is coming [from] ECOWAS and to also outline their position: That they are not returning to the Economic Community of West African States.
        • The West African economic bloc had suspended the three countries after their respective military takeovers, which occurred in July 2023 in Niger, September 2022 in Burkina Faso and August 2021 in Mali.
          • We are going to create an AES of the peoples, instead of an ECOWAS whose directives and instructions are dictated to it by powers that are foreign to Africa.
            • Westerners consider that we belong to them and our wealth also belongs to them. They think that they are the ones who must continue to tell us what is good for our states.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            78%

            • Unique Points
              • Niger’s military leader, speaking alongside the junta chiefs from Mali and Burkina Faso, announced they are 'turning their backs' on West Africa bloc Ecowas.
            • Accuracy
              • Niger's military leader, speaking alongside the junta chiefs from Mali and Burkina Faso, announced they are 'turning their backs' on Ecowas.
              • The three countries withdrew from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) regional bloc in January.
            • Deception (70%)
              The article contains several instances of emotional manipulation and selective reporting. The authors quote the leaders of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso expressing their desire for African unity and independence from foreign powers. While this is not inherently deceptive, the article frames it as such by implying that these leaders are turning their backs on Ecowas and rejecting foreign influence. The article also selectively reports on the reasons for the alliance, focusing only on the anti-colonial rhetoric and ignoring other potential motivations such as security cooperation. Additionally, there is a statement from Capt Traoré that implies a negative stereotype about imperialists without providing any context or evidence to support this claim.
              • The three men are irrevocably turning their backs on the wider West African bloc, Ecowas.
              • Capt Traoré went on to say that "this continent has suffered and continues to suffer from the fire of the imperialists. These imperialists have only one cliché in mind: 'Africa is the empire of slaves'.”
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The author makes an appeal to authority when quoting the leaders of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. They are making statements about their intentions and beliefs. This is not a fallacy as it is valid information from the authors themselves. However, since the article focuses on analyzing news articles for logical fallacies by authors and not those being quoted or the subject of the article, this appeal to authority does limit the potential score. Therefore, I cannot give a score higher than 85.
              • ]The three men are irrevocably turning their backs on the wider West African bloc, Ecowas.[/
              • In place of Ecowas, the junta chiefs wanted to build a community of sovereign peoples far from the control of foreign powers. A community of peace, solidarity, prosperity based on our African values.[
            • Bias (85%)
              Damian Zane implies that the three military leaders are turning their backs on Ecowas due to a desire for greater sovereignty and a rejection of foreign influence. This is an example of ideological bias as it suggests that the military leaders' actions are driven by a specific ideology, rather than other potential factors such as security concerns or internal politics.
              • Calls for greater sovereignty and a rejection of the former colonial power have been a key part of the rhetoric coming from the junta leaders.
                • Niger's military leader, speaking alongside the junta chiefs from Mali and Burkina Faso, has said they are "irrevocably" turning their backs on the wider West African bloc, Ecowas.
                  • Security co-operation is high on the agenda, but the alliance, known by its French acronym AES, will also look towards forming closer economic ties, including the aim of creating a common currency. This would be a rejection of the France-backed CFA Franc, which is used in many states across the region.
                    • Speaking at Saturday’s meeting in the Nigerien capital, Niamey, the country's leader, Gen Abdourahmane Tchiani, said that in the place of Ecowas, the junta chiefs wanted to build a community of sovereign peoples "far from the control of foreign powers.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    98%

                    • Unique Points
                      • Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso military leaders formed a confederation for political and economic integration.
                      • Juntas independently cut military ties with France and the US.
                      • Cooperation with Russia, Iran and Turkey reinforced following military takeovers.
                    • Accuracy
                      • The confederation divides West Africa into opposing alliances of democracies and military rulers.
                    • Deception (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Fallacies (95%)
                      The author makes a dichotomous depiction by describing West African countries as being either 'democracies' or 'military rulers'. This oversimplifies the complex political situations in these countries and ignores the nuances and variations that exist between them.
                      • Military leaders from Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso inched further away from their West African neighbors, forming a confederation aimed at reinforcing political and economic integration. The move — effectively dividing West Africa into opposing alliances of democracies and of military rulers — comes after the juntas independently cut military ties with France and the US.
                    • Bias (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    96%

                    • Unique Points
                      • The three juntas accused ECOWAS of being manipulated by France and left the organization in January
                      • Burkina Faso’s leader Capt Ibrahim Traore accused Western countries of exploiting Africa and its resources
                      • The AES will be an AES of the peoples instead of an ECOWAS whose directives are dictated by foreign powers
                      • Islamist insurgency in the Sahel region was a priority for the leaders and they promised to consolidate cooperation to quell violence
                      • More than 24 million people require assistance due to Islamist violence in the Sahel region
                    • Accuracy
                      • Niger’s military leader Gen Abdourahmane Tchiani called ECOWAS a threat to their states
                    • Deception (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Fallacies (95%)
                      The author does not commit any formal or informal fallacies in the provided text. However, there are instances of inflammatory rhetoric and dichotomous depiction used by the junta leaders that can be considered. The leaders accuse Western countries of exploiting Africa and making decisions for African states, implying that they are not capable of governing themselves (inflammatory rhetoric). They also depict ECOWAS as a threat to their states and an organization whose directives are dictated by foreign powers, while the AES is portrayed as effective in the fight against terrorism and representing the interests of African peoples (dichotomous depiction). These statements do not necessarily constitute fallacies but can be seen as biased or manipulative. Therefore, I cannot give a perfect score to this article.
                      • The nearly 50-year-old ECOWAS has become a threat to our states.
                      • Westerners consider that we belong to them and our wealth also belongs to them.
                      • The AES is the only effective sub-regional grouping in the fight against terrorism, while ECOWAS is conspicuous by its lack of involvement in this fight.
                    • Bias (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication