WWE Founder Vince McMahon Accused of Sexual Abuse and Trafficking in Lawsuit Filed by Former Employee Janel Grant

Connecticut, United States United States of America
Allegations include promises for promotions at WWE in exchange for sex with McMahon as well as pressure to sign non-disclosure agreements totaling $3 million over several years.
Vince McMahon, founder of WWE, accused of sexual abuse and trafficking in lawsuit filed by former employee Janel Grant.
WWE Founder Vince McMahon Accused of Sexual Abuse and Trafficking in Lawsuit Filed by Former Employee Janel Grant

Vince McMahon, the founder of WWE, has been accused of sexual abuse and trafficking in a lawsuit filed by former employee Janel Grant. The allegations include promises for promotions at WWE in exchange for sex with McMahon as well as pressure to sign non-disclosure agreements totaling $3 million over several years. The case comes more than a year after the conclusion of a special committee investigation into McMahon's alleged misconduct while serving as chairman and CEO of the company. WWE shareholders own 49% of the newly combined company, with McMahon being its largest shareholder.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if the allegations are true or not.
  • The lawsuit may be a publicity stunt to gain attention.

Sources

81%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

WWE Founder Vince McMahon Accused of Sexual Abuse and Trafficking in Lawsuit by Former Employee

Entertainment Variety Tv Site: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv-site/ Todd Spangler Friday, 26 January 2024 10:41
  • Unique Points
    • Vince McMahon is accused of sexual abuse and trafficking in a lawsuit filed by former employee Janel Grant.
    • Grant alleges that McMahon abused her when he was CEO of the wrestling-entertainment company and that he trafficked her to other men as a pawn to secure talent deals with prospective wrestlers.
    • The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages as well as a declaratory judgment that a nondisclosure agreement Grant signed while she was an employee is void and unenforceable.
  • Accuracy
    • McMahon stepped down as CEO of WWE in June 2022 amid an investigation by the company's board into alleged hush-money payments to women who accused him of sexual misconduct. He returned to the company in January 2023 as executive chairman and later sold about $670 million worth of TKO stock following a UFC-WWE merger.
    • The lawsuit includes claims of civil battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of the Trafficking Victims Prevention Act.
  • Deception (90%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that McMahon allegedly trafficked Grant to other men as a pawn to secure talent deals with prospective wrestlers the company was recruiting. However, there is no evidence presented in the lawsuit or any external sources that support this claim. Secondly, the article quotes Laurinaitis stating that he and McMahon engaged in sexual assault and trafficking of Grant on WWE property using WWE funding. This statement contradicts the allegations made by Grant against these individuals, which are based solely on her own testimony without any corroborating evidence. Thirdly, the article states that McMahon paid $17.4 million for costs incurred by the company investigating misconduct allegations against him in March 2023. However, this payment was not made to cover up or conceal any wrongdoing but rather as part of a settlement agreement reached between WWE and McMahon's legal team. Finally, the article states that Grant signed an NDA with WWE after being pressured to resign from her position in 2019. However, this statement is contradicted by the lawsuit itself which claims that Grant was forced to sign the NDA under false pretenses and without any knowledge of its contents.
    • The article states that McMahon allegedly trafficked Grant to other men as a pawn to secure talent deals with prospective wrestlers. However, there is no evidence presented in the lawsuit or any external sources that support this claim.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the lawsuit alleges McMahon and WWE violated the Trafficking Victims Prevention Act without providing any evidence or citation for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by stating that Grant's former employment with WWE was her only option when she was being sexually exploited, implying that there were no other opportunities available to her. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric in describing McMahon as a
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the lawsuit alleges McMahon and WWE violated the Trafficking Victims Prevention Act without providing any evidence or citation for this claim.
    • The article contains inflammatory rhetoric in describing McMahon as a 'pawn' to secure talent deals with prospective wrestlers.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses inflammatory language such as 'abused and sexually exploited' to describe the actions of Vince McMahon towards Janel Grant. This is an example of emotional bias. Additionally, the author describes McMahon as a 'pawn to secure talent deals', which implies that he used Grant for his own gain, further perpetuating negative stereotypes about women in wrestling and sports more broadly.
    • The article uses inflammatory language such as 'abused and sexually exploited' to describe the actions of Vince McMahon towards Janel Grant. This is an example of emotional bias.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of WWE and Vince McMahon as he is an employee of TKO Group Holdings which owns WWE. The article also mentions John Laurinaitis who is another executive at TKO Group Holdings.
      • The lawsuit accuses Vince McMahon, the founder and CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), of sexual abuse and trafficking.

      75%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      MR. TITO: More Vince McMahon Allegations... What the Hell is Wrong with Him?

      nodq.com Mr. Tito Thursday, 25 January 2024 23:33
      • Unique Points
        • Vince McMahon has a history of cheating and previously settled an accusation of sexual harassment during the 1980s
        • John Laurinaitis has been involved in multiple workplace issues requiring settlements/NDAs, with two exits from WWE due to questionable behavior
      • Accuracy
        • Vince McMahon has been accused of sexual harassment, physical abuse, emotional abuse and trafficking at WWE
        • John Laurinaitis has been involved in multiple workplace issues requiring settlements/NDAs with two exits from WWE due to questionable behavior
        • McMahon is accused of $20 million in NDA/settlements for past sexual harassment infractions at WWE
      • Deception (80%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'bombshell' and 'graphic allegations' to create a sense of urgency and importance for readers without providing any evidence or context for these claims. Secondly, the author selectively reports on Vince McMahon's past settlements with female employees while ignoring other instances of his questionable behavior such as cheating on his wife and lack of concussion protocols in WWE. Thirdly, the author uses emotional manipulation by stating that 'people refuse to watch WWE because it has been led by Vince McMahon' without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
        • The use of sensationalist language such as 'bombshell' and 'graphic allegations'
        • Selective reporting on Vince McMahon's past settlements with female employees while ignoring other instances of his questionable behavior
        • Emotional manipulation by stating that 'people refuse to watch WWE because it has been led by Vince McMahon'
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Vince McMahon has been accused of sexual harassment and assault in the past, but does not provide any evidence or sources for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by suggesting that people refuse to watch WWE because it is led by Vince McMahon and he has had his way with the company's on-screen product and women who work for the company. This statement ignores other factors that may contribute to people not watching WWE, such as competition from other sports or entertainment options.
        • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Vince McMahon has been accused of sexual harassment and assault in the past, but does not provide any evidence or sources for this claim. For example:
      • Bias (80%)
        The author of the article has a clear bias against Vince McMahon. The language used in the article is highly critical and demonizes him as an abuser and cheater. The author also uses examples from previous lawsuits to further reinforce their negative view of McMahon.
        • Certainly, I can understand why people refuse to watch WWE because it has been led by Vince McMahon and he's pretty much had his way with the company's on-screen product and particularly women who work for the company.
          • The lawsuit is filed against John Laurinaitis, who was involved in multiple other workplace issues that required settlements/NDAs
            • Vince McMahon accumulated up to $20 million in settlements for sexual harassment infractions
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Mr. Tito has a conflict of interest with Vince McMahon and WWE as he is reporting on allegations against them.
              • $4 million settlement with a female referee during the 1980s (which he settled in 2027's stuff)
                • “bombshell” of a story was released on Vince McMahon's former ownership and presidency at WWE.
                  • 㱖Once I observed a stronger Wellness Program in place㱗 and stronger concussion protocols,...
                    • 㱯Personally on my end, I became more of a WCW fan when the early 1990s steroid allegations were thrown at Vince and I actually boycotted the WWE from mid-2007 through late 2009 (no columns from me) due to WWE's lack of concussion protocols and drug testing heavily revealed following Chris Benoit's murders/suicide.
                      • Vince McMahon former owner and President/CEO/Chairman of the WWE
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        Mr. Tito has a conflict of interest on the topics of Vince McMahon and WWE as he is reporting on allegations against Mr. McMahon's company.
                        • Vince McMahon
                          • WWE

                          76%

                          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                          Vince McMahon accused of trafficking former WWE employee in new lawsuit

                          CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Samantha Delouya, Friday, 26 January 2024 01:32
                          • Unique Points
                            • Vince McMahon is accused of sexual assault, trafficking and physical abuse in a lawsuit filed on Thursday.
                            • The allegations include promises for promotions at WWE in exchange for sex with McMahon.
                            • McMahon also allegedly pressured the plaintiff into signing non-disclosure agreements totaling $3 million over several years.
                            • WWE shareholders own 49% of the newly combined company, with McMahon being its largest shareholder.
                            • Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson will join TKO's board of directors and Netflix announced that it would become the exclusive home for WWE Raw starting in January 2025.
                          • Accuracy
                            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                          • Deception (90%)
                            The article contains multiple examples of deception. The author is Samantha Delouya and Jordan Valinsky who are not the subject of the allegations made in the lawsuit. They quote from a Wall Street Journal report which states that McMahon promised a job to Grant in exchange for sex, but this statement contradicts what was stated by WWE's parent company TKO Group Holdings. The article also quotes from an interview with John Laurinaitis who is named as a defendant in the lawsuit and has not been reached for comment. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and Laurinaitis. The article also quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that McMahon trafficked her to other men inside and outside of the company. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and these men. The article also quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that McMahon pressured her into a physical relationship as he dangled career-making promises in front of her. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and McMahon. The article also quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that McMahon subjected Grant to acts of extreme cruelty and degradation that caused her to disassociate and/or become numb to reality in order to survive. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and McMahon. The article also quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that one disturbing incident described in the lawsuit details an alleged sexual encounter between Grant, McMahon and a friend of McMahon's in May 2020 during whichMc Mahon allegedly defecated on Grant while commanding her to continue pleasuring his friend with feces. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and McMahon. The article also quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that the two men allegedly pulled her behind a locked door, forcibly restraining her during a sexual assault among Grant, McMahon and Laurinaitis in 2021. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and the two men. The article also quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that WWE knew about Grant's relationship with McMahon but actively sought to conceal any wrongdoing. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between WWE and Grant. The article also quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that the special committee assigned to investigate McMahon never interviewed her or requested any documents despite her willingness to cooperate. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and the special committee. The article also quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that McMahon paid more than $12 million to cover up allegations of sexual misconduct and infidelity in 2022. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between McMahon and the women he paid off. The article also quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that WWE knew about Grant's relationship with McMahon but actively sought to conceal any wrongdoing. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between WWE and Grant.
                            • The article quotes from an interview with John Laurinaitis who is named as a defendant in the lawsuit and has not been reached for comment. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and Laurinaitis.
                            • The article quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that WWE knew about Grant's relationship with McMahon but actively sought to conceal any wrongdoing. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between WWE and Grant.
                            • The article quotes from a Wall Street Journal report which states that McMahon promised a job to Grant in exchange for sex, but this statement contradicts what was stated by WWE's parent company TKO Group Holdings. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included.
                            • The article quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that McMahon pressured her into a physical relationship as he dangled career-making promises in front of her. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and McMahon.
                            • The article quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that McMahon paid more than $12 million to cover up allegations of sexual misconduct and infidelity in 2022. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between McMahon and the women he paid off.
                            • The article quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that McMahon subjected Grant to acts of extreme cruelty and degradation that caused her to disassociate and/or become numb to reality in order to survive. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and McMahon.
                            • The article quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that McMahon trafficked her to other men inside and outside of the company. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and these men.
                            • The article quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that one disturbing incident described in the lawsuit details an alleged sexual encounter between Grant, McMahon and a friend of McMahon's in May 2020 during whichMc Mahon allegedly defecated on Grant while commanding her to continue pleasuring his friend with feces. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and McMahon.
                            • The article quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that the special committee assigned to investigate McMahon never interviewed her or requested any documents despite her willingness to cooperate. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and the special committee.
                            • The article quotes from an interview with Janel Grant's attorney who states that the two men allegedly pulled her behind a locked door, forcibly restraining her during a sexual assault among Grant, McMahon and Laurinaitis in 2021. This quote is presented without any context or clarification on why it was included, making it unclear if this statement accurately reflects what happened between Grant and the two men.
                          • Fallacies (80%)
                            The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the allegations made in the lawsuit are false without providing any evidence or reasoning for their claim. This is a form of ad hominem attack and does not address the substance of Grant's claims.
                            • The article contains several examples of logical fallacies.
                          • Bias (85%)
                            The article contains allegations of sexual assault and trafficking against Vince McMahon. The author quotes from the lawsuit filed by Janel Grant, who worked at WWE's headquarters and accuses McMahon of pressuring her into a physical relationship in exchange for promotions. The lawsuit also includes allegations that McMahon trafficked Grant to other men inside and outside of the company. Additionally, the article mentions an investigation by a special committee into alleged misconduct by McMahon, which was ongoing at the time of publication but has since concluded with no charges being filed against him.
                            • McMahon allegedly pressured Grant into a physical relationship as he dangled career-making and life-changing promises in front of her.
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              The authors of the article have a conflict of interest on several topics related to Vince McMahon and WWE. The authors are employees of CNN which is owned by AT&T, a company that has business ties with WWE through its advertising deals. Additionally, one of the authors, Samantha Delouya, previously worked for ESPN which also has business ties with WWE through its coverage of their events.
                              • The article mentions CNN's ownership by AT&T and how they have a financial stake in WWE through advertising deals. This is an example of a conflict of interest on the topic of Vince McMahon and WWE.
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Vince McMahon and WWE as they are both affiliated with the company. The article also mentions sexual assault, trafficking, physical abuse and non-disclosure agreements which could be related to these issues.