Judge's Secret Meeting with Prosecutors and Witness Puts Young Thug's Trial on Indefinite Hold

Atlanta, Georgia, USA United States of America
Defense attorneys filed motions seeking the recusal of Judge Ural Glanville following a meeting he had with prosecutors and a key witness without defendants or their lawyers present.
Judge Glanville had previously denied multiple motions from the defense but agreed on Monday that an outside judge should decide how the trial would proceed.
The delay in the trial is just one of several complications that have arisen during the proceedings. In June 2024, a key prosecution witness, Kenneth Copeland, refused to testify after being sworn in and invoked his Fifth Amendment right.
Young Thug's trial on gang and racketeering charges in Fulton County, Georgia was put on hold indefinitely on July 1, 2024.
Young Thug, whose given name is Jeffery Williams, is charged with conspiring to violate Georgia's anti-racketeering law and stands trial with five other defendants.
Judge's Secret Meeting with Prosecutors and Witness Puts Young Thug's Trial on Indefinite Hold

Young Thug's trial on gang and racketeering charges in Fulton County, Georgia, was put on hold indefinitely on July 1, 2024. The decision came after defense attorneys filed motions seeking the recusal of Judge Ural Glanville following a meeting he had with prosecutors and a key witness without the presence of defendants or their lawyers. The defense argued that the meeting was improper and attempted to pressure the witness into giving testimony.

The trial, which began in January 2023, has already faced numerous delays due to problems such as jury selection taking nearly 10 months and opening statements being presented in November. Young Thug, whose given name is Jeffery Williams, is charged with conspiring to violate Georgia's anti-racketeering law and stands trial with five other defendants.

Judge Glanville had previously denied multiple motions from the defense calling for him to step aside but agreed on Monday that an outside judge should decide how the trial would proceed. The jurors, who were already on a break until July 8, were informed they would not be needed until the matter is resolved.

Young Thug's attorney Brian Steel was held in contempt by Judge Glanville for refusing to reveal how he found out about the out-of-court meeting. However, the Georgia Supreme Court put that penalty on hold pending an appeal.

The case against Young Thug and his associates alleges they are responsible for violent crimes including killings, shootings, and carjackings to collect money for the gang, burnish its reputation, and expand its power and territory. The prosecutors say YSL also stands for Young Slime Life, an Atlanta-based violent street gang affiliated with the national Bloods gang.

The delay in the trial is just one of several complications that have arisen during the proceedings. In June 2024, a key prosecution witness, Kenneth Copeland, refused to testify after being sworn in and invoked his Fifth Amendment right to protect against self-incrimination despite having already been granted immunity. Copeland spent a weekend in jail on contempt charges before agreeing to testify.

The trial is expected to resume once another judge has ruled on Judge Glanville's recusal. The exact timeline for this decision is unknown.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Did the defense have sufficient evidence to prove pressure was applied during the meeting?
  • Was the meeting between Judge Glanville, prosecutors, and the witness truly improper?

Sources

82%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Judge halts Young Thug trial in Georgia amid complaints of misconduct

The Fixing Site: A Summary of the Article. Holly Bailey Monday, 01 July 2024 18:20
  • Unique Points
    • The judge overseeing Young Thug’s racketeering case in Fulton County, Georgia, Ural Glanville, has indefinitely recessed the trial until an outside judge can review motions for recusal filed by the rapper and others.
    • The motions allege that Glanville and prosecutors held an improper meeting with a key witness, Kenneth Copeland.
    • Last month, Brian Steel, Young Thug’s lead attorney, was found in contempt and ordered to serve 20 weekend days in jail after questioning Glanville about the meeting and refusing to reveal the source of his information.
    • Glanville initially made the hearing public, announcing that he planned to release a transcript of the meeting with Copeland, then reversed himself, stating that another judge would determine whether he should remain on the case.
  • Accuracy
    • Judge Glanville initially made the hearing public, announcing that he planned to release a transcript of the meeting with Copeland, then reversed himself.
    • Several defendants in Young Thug’s case have not gone to trial yet. Judge Glanville severed their cases from Young Thug and the others in late December.
    • The last day for these defendants to accept plea deals offered by the state was June 28, 2024.
    • Five of the defendants rejected the plea deals during a court proceeding on June 28, meaning their cases will proceed to trial.
    • Three of the defendants still have an opportunity to consider a plea deal because they did not have attorneys present or their attorney was new to the case.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article provides a detailed account of the legal proceedings in the case against Young Thug without making any claims that are not supported by evidence or implying any facts without references. The author does not editorialize and only reports on the events as they unfolded in court. However, there are some issues with selective reporting and omission of certain details.
    • The Young Thug prosecution is one of two high-profile criminal racketeering cases being led by Willis’s office.
  • Fallacies (90%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority and a potential dichotomous depiction. The author cites the allegations of misconduct without providing evidence for them, which could be seen as an appeal to authority. Additionally, the article presents the prosecution's case against Young Thug as a high-profile and lengthy trial with numerous problems, potentially creating a dichotomous depiction of the defendant as either guilty due to his association with violent crimes or innocent because his lyrics are considered artistic expression.
    • The Young Thug prosecution is one of two high-profile criminal racketeering cases being led by Willis’s office.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

94%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

YSL defendants in court: Several remaining defendants reject plea deals

Fox News Channel (Atlanta) Joyce Lupiani Tuesday, 02 July 2024 04:26
  • Unique Points
    • Several defendants in Young Thug's case have not gone to trial yet.
    • Judge Glanville severed their cases from Young Thug and the others in late December.
    • The last day for these defendants to accept plea deals offered by the state was June 28, 2024.
    • Five of the defendants rejected the plea deals during a court proceeding on June 28, meaning their cases will proceed to trial.
    • Three of the defendants still have an opportunity to consider a plea deal because they did not have attorneys present or their attorney was new to the case.
  • Accuracy
    • Several defendants in Young Thug’s case have not gone to trial yet.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

80%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Young Thug trial halted pending a ruling on judge’s recusal

Atlanta Journal-Constitution Jozsef Papp, Tuesday, 02 July 2024 04:27
  • Unique Points
    • Defense attorneys asked for Judge Glanville’s recusal following a private meeting between the judge, prosecutors, and state witness Kenneth Copeland.
    • The attorneys accused the judge and prosecutors of coercing Copeland into testifying by threatening him with indefinite jail time if he refused.
  • Accuracy
    • Judge Ural Glanville halted Young Thug's trial until another judge decides on his recusal.
    • The motions allege that Glanville and prosecutors held an improper meeting with a key witness, Kenneth Copeland.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the authors' position of the judges alleged improper conduct. The authors quote several attorneys expressing their concerns about the judge's conduct and accusing him of coercion, but do not provide any counterargument or evidence from the judge or prosecutors. Additionally, there is emotional manipulation through phrases like 'bully,' 'outrages Atlanta lawyers,' and 'beyond the scope of anything I thought I’d see from a superior court judge.'
    • Grubman also said Glanville should be recused from the case, that a mistrial should be granted, and that the defendants who aren’t already serving prison sentences should be released from jail until District Attorney Fani Willis decides whether to retry them.
    • Explore ‘He became a bully’: YSL judge’s conduct outrages Atlanta lawyers
    • The attorneys called the judge’s conduct improper, contending they had a right to be present for the meeting held in Glanville’s chambers.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The authors commit the fallacy of Appeal to Authority when they quote attorney Doug Grubman stating that 'Glanville should have set the case aside last month when the recusal motions were filed.' and 'That’s not what happened here. He didn’t notify anyone. He was caught.' This implies that Grubman's opinion is correct and justifies their own position, even though they are not experts in Georgia court procedures or law. They also use inflammatory rhetoric when they describe Glanville as 'a bully' and his conduct as 'beyond the scope of anything I thought I’d see from a superior court judge.'
    • The problem is he wasn’t thinking,
    • That’s not what happened here. He didn’t notify anyone. He was caught.
    • It's not just (Glanville’s) misconduct, it's the effect that his misconduct has had on the integrity of the judicial system.
    • They're watching this, and if the new judge gets this wrong, it’s going right back up to the Supreme Court to make a decision.
  • Bias (90%)
    The authors use language that depicts the judge's actions as bullying and coercion towards a witness. They also accuse the judge of improper conduct by holding a private meeting with prosecutors and the witness without notifying the defense attorneys.
    • Grubman said that Glanville should have set the case aside last month when the recusal motions were filed.
      • He became a bully
        • That’s not what happened here. He didn’t notify anyone. He was caught. And when he was caught, he tried to send the lawyer who caught him to jail.
          • They also accused the judge and prosecutors of coercing the reluctant Copeland into testifying by threatening him with indefinite jail time if he refused.
            • they had a right to be present for the meeting held in Glanville’s chambers
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            96%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            Young Thug’s Gang Trial Is Paused Because of Judge’s Secret Meeting

            The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Joe Coscarelli Monday, 01 July 2024 20:29
            • Unique Points
              • Judge Ural Glanville announced that the case would not proceed until another judge decides whether he should recuse himself from the trial.
              • Defense attorneys argued for Judge Glanville’s recusal following a meeting with prosecutors and an uncooperative witness, which they deemed improper and potentially unconstitutional.
              • Judge Glanville had previously denied multiple motions from the defense calling for him to step aside but agreed on Monday that an outside judge should decide how the trial would proceed.
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains a dichotomous depiction and an appeal to authority. It presents the situation as either the judge recused himself or the trial continues with him presiding, without providing nuanced analysis of other possible solutions. Additionally, it relies on the opinion of prosecutors when stating that Judge Glanville's meeting with an uncooperative witness was improper and potentially unconstitutional.
              • The much-delayed case was halted indefinitely to determine whether the judge should recuse himself after meeting with an uncooperative witness.
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            98%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            Young Thug's trial on hold as defense tries to get judge removed from case

            The Associated Press News Monday, 01 July 2024 20:45
            • Unique Points
              • The request for Judge Glanville’s recusal stems from a meeting he held with prosecutors and a prosecution witness without defendants or their attorneys present, which lawyers called ‘improper’ and attempted to pressure the witness into giving testimony.
              • Judge Glanville has maintained there was nothing improper about the meeting with prosecutors and the witness.
            • Accuracy
              • The trial of Young Thug and others on racketeering and gang charges has been put on hold until another judge rules on requests by several defendants for the current judge, Ural Glanville, to be removed from the case.
              • Judge Glanville initially made the hearing public, announcing that he planned to release a transcript of the meeting with Copeland, then reversed himself.
              • Defense attorneys accused the judge and prosecutors of coercing Copeland into testifying by threatening him with indefinite jail time if he refused.
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (95%)
              The article contains an appeal to authority when it states 'prosecutors say YSL also stands for Young Slime Life, which they allege is an Atlanta-based violent street gang affiliated with the national Bloods gang and founded by Young Thug and two others in 2012.' This statement is not a logical conclusion drawn by the author, but rather a repetition of the prosecutors' claims. However, since there are no other fallacies found in this article and the appeal to authority does not significantly impact the overall content or argument of the article, I am scoring it at 95.
              • prosecutors say YSL also stands for Young Slime Life, which they allege is an Atlanta-based violent street gang affiliated with the national Bloods gang and founded by Young Thug and two others in 2012.
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication