Paula Lavigne
Paula Lavigne is an award-winning investigative reporter who has covered Title IX and college athletics extensively. Her work has been recognized by the Alfred I. duPont Columbia University Award, the Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE) awards, the Gannett Foundation Award, and Emmy nominations. In her reporting career, Lavigne has exposed patterns of sexual misconduct in college sports and highlighted issues with how institutions handle Title IX complaints. She has also provided insightful analysis on the cultural factors that contribute to these issues.
91%
The Daily's Verdict
This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.
Bias
90%
Examples:
- The article also highlights how biased reporting and lack of due process can harm those accused, particularly when they are high-profile athletes. This has led to some cases not being investigated thoroughly or fairly.
- The data provided in the article shows a clear pattern of athletes being more likely to be accused of sexual misconduct or domestic violence in complaints made at Power 5 conference schools. This is despite the fact that athletes represent only a small percentage of the overall student population.
- There is evidence in the article to suggest that institutions may be more likely to protect their athletes from consequences, further exacerbating the issue.
Conflicts of Interest
85%
Examples:
- The article suggests that there may be a conflict of interest when institutions investigate cases involving their own athletes, as they may be more likely to protect them from consequences.
- There is also a potential conflict of interest when Title IX offices are understaffed and overburdened with complaints, as they may not have the resources to properly investigate all cases.
Contradictions
85%
Examples:
- The article highlights contradictions in how data on complaints involving athletes is collected and reported. Some schools provided exact data on complaints involving athletes, while others did not.
- There are also contradictions in the reasons why athletes may be more likely to be named in Title IX complaints, with some experts suggesting it could be due to cultural issues within athletics and others disputing this claim.
Deceptions
95%
Examples:
- The article highlights how deception and manipulation may play a role in cases involving high-profile athletes, particularly when it comes to retaliation for reporting such incidents.
- There are also examples of how institutions may attempt to hide or downplay data on complaints involving athletes, which can further contribute to deceptiveness.
Recent Articles
Japanese Baseball Star Shohei Ohtani Victim of $17M Fraud Scheme by Former Interpreter Ippei Mizuhara
Broke On: Wednesday, 08 May 2024Japanese baseball star Shohei Ohtani, currently playing for the Los Angeles Dodgers, fell victim to a fraud scheme orchestrated by his former interpreter and translator, Ippei Mizuhara. Mizuhara gained unauthorized access to Ohtani's bank account and transferred approximately $17 million without the player's knowledge. He faces federal charges for bank fraud and filing a false tax return. FBI Joins Investigation into Allegations Against Former Michigan Assistant Football Coach
Broke On: Tuesday, 15 March 2022The FBI has joined the investigation into allegations against a former assistant football coach at the University of Michigan. The coach is accused of stealing signs from opposing teams, a violation of NCAA rules. The allegations were first brought to light by a former Ohio State offensive lineman, Dawand Jones.