Mark Joseph

Mark Joseph is a journalist who covers the Supreme Court and legal affairs. He has written extensively on issues related to originalism, the conservative movement, and the impact of the Supreme Court on American society. His work often explores the ways in which legal decisions can affect marginalized communities and shape cultural discourse. Joseph's writing is characterized by a commitment to fairness, empathy, and thorough analysis.

Biography:  https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/11/im-grateful-to-be-gay-because-otherwise-i-might-have-been-a-horrible-person.html

86%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

84%

Examples:

  • The author acknowledges the potential for historical analysis to be used as a tool for justifying discriminatory laws.
  • The author demonstrates a tendency towards impartiality in favor of originalism and the Supreme Court's conservative majority.

Conflicts of Interest

98%

Examples:

  • The author discusses how judges and democratic branches can be influenced by unelected officials in the Supreme Court.
  • The author mentions that conservative justices are prone to favor originalism.

Contradictions

85%

Examples:

  • The author highlights instances where the Supreme Court has overruled longstanding precedents, such as Chevron v. NRDC.
  • The author points out that the Supreme Court's ruling on trademarks made up of living individuals' names without their consent relied solely on history.

Deceptions

78%

Examples:

  • The author implies that social media companies are censoring speech when they moderate content deemed harmful.
  • The author suggests that the Supreme Court's focus on history and tradition may have influenced its decision in a case involving trademarks.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Precedent, Weakening Federal Agency Regulatory Power

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron Precedent, Weakening Federal Agency Regulatory Power

Broke On: Friday, 28 June 2024 In a landmark decision on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron precedent from 1984, weakening federal agencies' power to approve regulations. The ruling shifts balance of power towards judicial branch and could impact various aspects of American life. Critics argue it restores rule-of-law values and limits regulatory authority, but opponents warn about potential uncertainty and instability.
Supreme Court to Hear Landmark Case on Constitutionality of Tennessee's Transgender Medical Care Ban

Supreme Court to Hear Landmark Case on Constitutionality of Tennessee's Transgender Medical Care Ban

Broke On: Monday, 24 June 2024 The US Supreme Court will hear a landmark case, United States v. Skrmetti, challenging Tennessee's law banning certain medical treatments for transgender minors. This marks the first time the justices consider statewide bans on transgender healthcare amidst increasing efforts to curtail transgender rights. Three teenagers, their parents, and a physician argue that the law violates equal protection by discriminating based on sex, with support from major medical groups and the Biden administration.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett Challenges Justice Clarence Thomas on the Use of History in Supreme Court Decisions

Justice Amy Coney Barrett Challenges Justice Clarence Thomas on the Use of History in Supreme Court Decisions

Broke On: Wednesday, 19 June 2024 Justice Amy Coney Barrett's recent dissents challenge Justice Clarence Thomas' reliance on historical evidence in Supreme Court decisions, potentially signaling a rift among originalists. In a trademark case, Barrett argued for generally applicable principles instead of relying solely on history. The disagreement between the two justices could lead to varying outcomes and implications for future cases.
Supreme Court's Humiliating Mess: Encouraging Social Media Moderation of Dangerous Lies About Pandemic

Supreme Court's Humiliating Mess: Encouraging Social Media Moderation of Dangerous Lies About Pandemic

Broke On: Monday, 18 March 2024 The Supreme Court debated whether government officials can pressure social media companies to regulate content, specifically regarding false information about a pandemic. Judge Doughty's ruling was inconsistent and inaccurate.
Oregon Supreme Court Rules Against Republican Senators Who Boycotted Legislative Sessions

Oregon Supreme Court Rules Against Republican Senators Who Boycotted Legislative Sessions

Broke On: Saturday, 03 February 2024 The Oregon Supreme Court has ruled that 10 Republican state senators cannot run for re-election after repeatedly boycotting legislative sessions. The court upheld a constitutional provision designed to penalize absent lawmakers, enforcing the rule that any legislator with more than 10 unexcused absences during a session is disqualified from holding office in the subsequent term.

Federal Judge Issues Gag Order to Donald Trump Regarding White House Records

Broke On: Sunday, 01 October 2023 A federal judge has issued a gag order to former President Donald Trump, preventing him from blocking the release of White House records to the House committee investigating the January 6th Capitol attack. The National Archives, which currently holds the records, has stated that it will take several weeks to process the records before they can be released. The House committee has been seeking these records as part of its investigation into the events leading up to the January 6th Capitol attack.