John Genovese

John Genovese is a journalist who has been known for his unbiased reporting. He has a reputation for providing detailed and comprehensive coverage of the topics he writes about. In the case of the Grand Canyon University investigation, he provided a balanced view, despite a slight bias towards the students' perspective.

94%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.

Bias

85%

Examples:

  • In the article 'Grand Canyon University faces record fine after federal probe into alleged deception', the author seems to favor the perspective of the students, providing more details about their experiences and less about the university's response.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Recent Articles

Grand Canyon University Ordered to Pay Record $37.7 Million Fine for Alleged Deception

Broke On: Tuesday, 31 October 2023 Grand Canyon University has been ordered to pay a record fine of $37.7 million by the U.S. Department of Education. The fine is the result of a federal investigation into allegations of deceptive practices by the university. The Department of Education found that GCU had misled students about the cost of attendance, the nature of its educational programs, and the transferability of credits.