Shannon Bream,

100%

The Daily's Verdict

This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.

Bias

No current examples available.

Conflicts of Interest

No current examples available.

Contradictions

No current examples available.

Deceptions

No current examples available.

Recent Articles

Biden Raises $30 Million at Star-Studded Event, Warns of Consequences if Trump Re-Elected and Fills Supreme Court Vacancies

Biden Raises $30 Million at Star-Studded Event, Warns of Consequences if Trump Re-Elected and Fills Supreme Court Vacancies

Broke On: Saturday, 15 June 2024 President Joe Biden raised $30 million at a Hollywood gala with George Clooney, Julia Roberts, and Barack Obama for his re-election campaign. He warned of the consequences if Donald Trump secures another term and appoints two more Supreme Court justices. Biden previously filled one vacancy with Ketanji Brown Jackson, emphasizing his intent to nominate 'progressive judges' for future vacancies.
Liz Cheney Urges Supreme Court to Reject Trump's Immunity Claim, Calls for January 6 Evidence to be Presented in Court

Liz Cheney Urges Supreme Court to Reject Trump's Immunity Claim, Calls for January 6 Evidence to be Presented in Court

Broke On: Tuesday, 01 August 2023 Former Rep. Liz Cheney urges Supreme Court to deny Trump's request for delaying January 6 trial, emphasizing public's right to know critical evidence about his conduct on that day and potential risks if given presidency again.
Supreme Court Cases Threaten Federal Agencies' Power to Enforce Laws

Supreme Court Cases Threaten Federal Agencies' Power to Enforce Laws

Broke On: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 The Supreme Court is considering two cases that could weaken the power of federal agencies to interpret and enforce laws. The first case involves Atlantic herring fishermen challenging a regulation requiring them to pay for regulatory monitors on their boats, while the second case concerns fishing fleets and business groups fighting against this rule. In both cases, conservative justices have pressed federal agencies to interpret ambiguous laws passed by Congress rather than judges. If the court rules in favor of these challenges, it could lead to a reduction in executive agency power and make it harder for future presidents to defend their regulatory agendas.