Andrew Fleischman

@ASFleischman Andrew Fleischman is a criminal defense lawyer with Sessions & Fleischman in Atlanta. Along with trial and personal injury work, Fleischman specializes in representing the wrongfully or unfairly convicted. Why We Can’t Just Shrug Off the Fani Willis Scandal opinion LOOKS REALLY BAD

Biography:  https://www.thedailybeast.com/author/andrew

72%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

85%

Examples:

  • The article is biased towards the Trump side and against the prosecution of Donald Trump.
  • The author argues that hiring an inexperienced person for this role and paying him a lot of money should not have any impact on the Donald Trump RICO case, but it seems like those facts may not be in dispute.
  • The author uses Nathan Wade's personal relationship with Fani Willis as evidence to disqualify her from her role.
  • The author uses personal attacks against Fani Willis by comparing her to Martin Luther King Jr.

Conflicts of Interest

50%

Examples:

  • The author has a conflict of interest as he is a criminal defense lawyer who specializes in representing the wrongfully or unfairly convicted.
  • The author may have an agenda to defend his clients and undermine the prosecution of Donald Trump.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

  • The article is full of contradictions and inconsistencies in its arguments.
  • The author contradicts himself by claiming that hiring an inexperienced person for this role should not have any impact on the case, but then suggesting that it does.
  • The author presents a one-sided view of Fani Willis' hiring of Nathan Wade without providing any context or evidence to support their claim that it was solely due to her personal relationship with him.

Deceptions

80%

Examples:

  • The article contains false or misleading information about the case and the people involved.
  • The article is deceptive in its portrayal of Fani Willis as a competent special prosecutor when her hiring of Wade and subsequent decisions throughout her prosecution seem calculated to require him.
  • The author uses emotional manipulation by comparing Willis' situation to Martin Luther King Jr.'s and suggesting that she is being unfairly scrutinized because of her race.

Recent Articles

Georgia Bureau of Investigation Clears Fani Willis of Improper Relationship Allegations

Georgia Bureau of Investigation Clears Fani Willis of Improper Relationship Allegations

Broke On: Thursday, 18 January 2024 The Georgia Bureau of Investigation has cleared Fani Willis, the district attorney in Atlanta who is prosecuting former President Donald Trump and his allies over efforts to overturn the 2020 election in Georgia, of any wrongdoing regarding an improper relationship with Nathan Wade. The bureau conducted an investigation into the matter but found no evidence.