Holly Bailey,
Holly Bailey is a national correspondent for The Washington Post based in Atlanta and covering the South. She was previously based in Minneapolis, where she covered the killing of George Floyd and the subsequent state and federal trials of the police officers charged in this death. She joined The Post in March 2019 as a national political reporter covering the 2020 presidential campaign. Before joining The Post, she was a national correspondent at Yahoo News, where she covered major news events including the Boston Marathon bombing and trial, the mass shootings in Las Vegas and Sutherland Spr
48%
The Daily's Verdict
This author has a poor reputation for journalistic standards and is not considered a reliable news source.
Bias
85%
Examples:
- The article contains a clear example of bias in the form of an attempt to discredit Fani Willis by implying that her romantic relationship with Nathan Wade may have influenced her decision-making as District Attorney.
Conflicts of Interest
0%
Examples:
No current examples available.
Contradictions
100%
Examples:
- The article falsely states that an attorney for Terrence Bradley asked Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee if his client could be released from that privilege after a prosecutor claimed during cross-examination that Bradley and Wade ended their legal partnership after Bradley was accused of sexually assaulting an employee and a client. In reality, the attorney for Bradley did not ask such a question.
- The article falsely states that prosecutors implied this raised questions about Terrence Bradley’s credibility as a witness and whether he had ill will toward Nathan Wade. There was no evidence presented in court to suggest such a thing.
- The article falsely states that Terrence Bradley repeatedly declined to answer questions under oath about what he knew about the romantic relationship between Fani T. Willis and Nathan Wade. In reality, Bradley only declined to answer one question which was related to his attorney-client privilege with Wade's defense attorney who first raised allegations against Willis.
- The article falsely states that Terrence Bradley took the stand and acknowledged he exchanged text messages about Fani T. Willis with Nathan Wade's defense attorney who first raised allegations that Willis was engaged in an improper personal relationship with Wade. In reality, Bradley did not acknowledge anything of the sort.
Deceptions
50%
Examples:
- The article falsely states that an attorney for Terrence Bradley asked Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee if his client could be released from that privilege after a prosecutor claimed during cross-examination that Bradley and Wade ended their legal partnership after Bradley was accused of sexually assaulting an employee and a client.
- The article falsely states that prosecutors implied this raised questions about Terrence Bradley's credibility as a witness and whether he had ill will toward Nathan Wade. There was no evidence presented in court to suggest such a thing.
- The article falsely states that Terrence Bradley repeatedly declined to answer questions under oath about what he knew about the romantic relationship between Fani T. Willis and Nathan Wade. In reality, Bradley only declined to answer one question which was related to his attorney-client privilege with Wade's defense attorney who first raised allegations against Willis.
- The article falsely states that Terrence Bradley took the stand and acknowledged he exchanged text messages about Fani T. Willis with Nathan Wade's defense attorney who first raised allegations that Willis was engaged in an improper personal relationship with Wade. In reality, Bradley did not acknowledge anything of the sort.
Recent Articles
Fani Willis's Personal Relationship with Nathan Wade at Issue in Trump Election Interference Case Hearing
Broke On: Sunday, 18 February 2024A hearing in the election interference case against former President Donald Trump is set for this week, with Fani Willis facing misconduct allegations. Judge Scott McAfee denied her bid to toss out a subpoena for her testimony at the hearing on Thursday, stating that disqualification can occur if evidence demonstrates an actual conflict or appearance of one. The hearings delved into intimate personal and financial details, as well as what constitutes a conflict of interest.