Cat Zakrzewski,

Cat Zakrzewski is a national technology policy reporter for The Washington Post. She focuses on AI policy and legal battles over free speech online. Her reporting covers social media, privacy and antitrust issues in the tech industry. Previously she served as the first anchor of The Technology 202 newsletter, where she covered central roles that tech issues played in pandemic, elections and other events.

Biography:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/cat-zakrzewski/

79%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

85%

Examples:

  • The Supreme Court on Monday will hear oral arguments to determine the constitutionality of that Texas law along with a related Florida law, which prohibits platforms from suspending the accounts of political candidates or media publications. To fight back, the tech industry increasingly uses the First Amendment as a shield, and legal experts warn an overly broad ruling in favor of the companies could establish a constitutional right to bat away regulation.

Conflicts of Interest

50%

Examples:

  • The Supreme Court on Monday will hear oral arguments to determine the constitutionality of that Texas law along with a related Florida law, which prohibits platforms from suspending the accounts of political candidates or media publications. To fight back, the tech industry increasingly uses the First Amendment as a shield, and legal experts warn an overly broad ruling in favor of the companies could establish a constitutional right to bat away regulation.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

  • The Supreme Court on Monday will hear oral arguments to determine the constitutionality of that Texas law along with a related Florida law, which prohibits platforms from suspending the accounts of political candidates or media publications. To fight back, the tech industry increasingly uses the First Amendment as a shield, and legal experts warn an overly broad ruling in favor of the companies could establish a constitutional right to bat away regulation.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

  • The Supreme Court on Monday will hear oral arguments to determine the constitutionality of that Texas law along with a related Florida law, which prohibits platforms from suspending the accounts of political candidates or media publications. To fight back, the tech industry increasingly uses the First Amendment as a shield, and legal experts warn an overly broad ruling in favor of the companies could establish a constitutional right to bat away regulation.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments on Constitutionality of Texas and Florida Laws Prohibiting Social Media Companies from Removing Posts or Accounts Based on Viewpoint Violating First Amendment

Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments on Constitutionality of Texas and Florida Laws Prohibiting Social Media Companies from Removing Posts or Accounts Based on Viewpoint Violating First Amendment

Broke On: Monday, 26 February 2024 The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the constitutionality of Texas and Florida laws that restrict social media companies' ability to remove posts or accounts based on viewpoint. These laws violate the First Amendment, potentially leading to a patchwork of internet regulations rooted in political whims.