Unknown GeneralEditor

The author is a self-proclaimed expert on clouds who runs a website called Cloud Appreciation Society. He claims that he has been studying clouds for over 20 years and has visited many places around the world to observe them. However, there is no verifiable information about his education, background, or credentials in this field.

46%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a poor reputation for journalistic standards and is not considered a reliable news source.

Bias

50%

Examples:

  • The author tends to use sensational language and exaggeration when describing the effects of clouds on climate and weather. For example, he says that Cumulus clouds can cause droughts or floods by blocking sunlight.

Conflicts of Interest

40%

Examples:

  • The author may also be trying to promote his own cloud-related products or services through his articles.
  • There is no clear evidence of any financial or personal interests influencing the author's writing. However, he does seem to have a strong bias against clouds and their importance for the environment.

Contradictions

65%

Examples:

  • The author also contradicts scientific evidence by claiming that Cumulus clouds affect temperature or reflect solar radiation.
  • The author contradicts himself in different articles about the same topic. For instance, he claims that Cumulus clouds disappear during solar eclipses in one article and then says they can survive even complete solar eclipses in another.

Deceptions

45%

Examples:

  • He also uses emotive language and personal anecdotes to appeal to the reader's emotions rather than facts.
  • The author uses misleading or inaccurate information to support his claims about clouds. For example, he cites a study that has not been peer-reviewed and does not provide any evidence for his statements.

Recent Articles

Solar Eclipses and the Disappearance of Cumulus Clouds: Implications for Climate Engineering Techniques

Solar Eclipses and the Disappearance of Cumulus Clouds: Implications for Climate Engineering Techniques

Broke On: Wednesday, 28 February 2024 A study reveals that during a solar eclipse, shallow cumulus clouds over land begin to disappear when around 15% of the Sun's disc is obscured by the Moon. This occurs because Cumulus clouds feed off columns of rising air called thermals and these rising thermals are formed by the heat of the sun shining down onto the ground. As less solar radiation reaches Earth during a solar eclipse, fewer cumulus clouds form and those that do dissipate quickly once they begin to disappear. This study has implications for climate engineering techniques as it shows that scientists may be underestimating the amount of solar radiation reaching Earth during a total solar eclipse.