Paul Rosenzweig

Paul Rosenzweig is a principal at Red Branch Consulting and previously served as the deputy assistant secretary for policy of the Department of Homeland Security. He teaches cybersecurity at George Washington University Law School and has worked on investigations into President Bill Clinton. In this article, he discusses Trump's appeal to the Supreme Court and his claim of absolute immunity.

Biography:  https://www.theatlantic.com/author/paul-rosenzweig/

66%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

75%

Examples:

  • The author has a clear bias towards Trump and his legal case. They use strong language such as 'delay', 'complicit' and 'affording him the delay he so desperately desires'. The article also implies that Trump is innocent of any wrongdoing which could be seen as biased.

Conflicts of Interest

50%

Examples:

  • There is no clear evidence of conflict of interest in the article. However, it's worth noting that Paul Rosenzweig has previously worked as a senior counsel for President Bill Clinton and served on the investigation into his affair with Monica Lewinsky.

Contradictions

10%

Examples:

  • The author does not provide any contradictions in this article.

Deceptions

90%

Examples:

  • The author uses misleading language in the title of the article which implies that Trump's appeal was mandatory when it wasn't. They also use strong language to suggest that Jack Smith is trying to terminate cases against Trump.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Grants Hearing on Trump's Immunity Claim in Criminal Prosecution Case

Supreme Court Grants Hearing on Trump's Immunity Claim in Criminal Prosecution Case

Broke On: Friday, 01 March 2024 The Supreme Court has granted former President Donald Trump's case for absolute immunity from criminal prosecution, sparking mixed reactions among scholars and journalists.