Anna Kodé

Anna Kod’s biography describes her as a reporter covering design and culture for the Real Estate section of The New York Times. She writes about how popular depictions of the built environment shape our spaces and explores greater social significance through objects we place in our homes. Anna has won awards for her work, including a silver award from the National Association of Real Estate Editors for best architecture story.

54%

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

75%

Examples:

  • The article mentions that REBNY has already rolled out new rules on how it will govern agent commissions on home sales in response to the NAR settlement. This means that New York City buyers and sellers will be affected by these changes.
  • The author claims that most real estate agents in New York are not affiliated with the National Association of Realtors (NAR), but this statement is false.

Conflicts of Interest

50%

Examples:

  • The author does not mention any conflict of interest in the article.

Contradictions

10%

Examples:

  • None

Deceptions

30%

Examples:

  • The article mentions that REBNY has already rolled out new rules on how it will govern agent commissions on home sales in response to the NAR settlement. This means that New York City buyers and sellers will be affected by these changes.
  • The author claims that most real estate agents in New York are not affiliated with the National Association of Realtors (NAR), but this statement is false.

Recent Articles

The NAR Settlement: A Win for Homebuyers and Sellers, but a Potential Loss for Vulnerable Populations?

The NAR Settlement: A Win for Homebuyers and Sellers, but a Potential Loss for Vulnerable Populations?

Broke On: Sunday, 24 March 2024 A recent settlement by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) aims to simplify home buying, but experts warn it could harm vulnerable populations. The $418 million deal eliminates long-standing rules on broker commissions and may increase price transparency in real estate. However, lowering annual commissions for buyer agents could lead to higher costs for buyers and leave some segments of the population worse off.