Aggie Chambre,

Aggie Chambre is a host of POLITICO’s Westminster Insider podcast. Prior to working for POLITICO, Aggie was a Political News Editor and Producer for Sky News. During this time she launched the Open Secret podcast about culture in Westminster, which told wide-ranging stories of sexual misconduct and bullying in politics. Aggie spent the first few years of her career as a Reporter at PoliticsHome, before going to work on Robert Peston’s political interview show ‘Peston on Sunday’ and ‘Peston'. She grew up in Cambridge, and holds a Philosophy degree from the University of York and an MA from City University.

Biography:  https://www.politico.eu/staff/aggie-chambre/

63%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

85%

Examples:

  • The article does not provide any evidence for its claims and relies on unnamed sources.
  • The article implies that the targets of the scandal are guilty or complicit by using phrases like 'admitting to leaking colleagues’ numbers'.
  • The article uses emotive language such as 'honey trap' and 'sexting scam' to sensationalize the story.

Conflicts of Interest

50%

Examples:

  • The article does not disclose any potential sources of bias or conflicts of interest.
  • The article may have a conflict of interest as it promotes POLITICO's Westminster Insider podcast.

Contradictions

85%

Examples:

  • The article does not specify how many targets there were or who they are.
  • The title is misleading and implies that William Wragg was involved in the sexting scam when he was a victim of it.
  • William Wragg was not confirmed as a target of the scandal but only admitted to leaking colleagues’ numbers under pressure.

Deceptions

50%

Examples:

  • The article does not provide any context or background for the scandal or its implications.
  • The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as 'targeted', 'explicit messages', and 'compromising material' without defining them.

Recent Articles

Westminster Faces Scandal Over Sexting and Spear-Phishing Attacks on MPs, Including William Wragg

Westminster Faces Scandal Over Sexting and Spear-Phishing Attacks on MPs, Including William Wragg

Broke On: Friday, 05 April 2024 Westminster is facing a scandal involving sexting and spear-phishing attacks on MPs, including William Wragg who shared personal phone numbers under pressure. The investigation continues as cybersecurity threats become increasingly prevalent in parliament.