Unknown amy-howe

Amy Howe is an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. She primarily writes for her eponymous blog, Howe on the Court. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. She has also taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School and Harvard Law School as an adjunct professor. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master's degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.

Biography:  https://www.scotusblog.com/author/Amy-Howe/

100%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.

Bias

100%

Examples:

  • Amy Howe is an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. She has experience as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. However, no unique examples of bias could be found in her reporting.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • No unique examples of conflicts of interest could be found in Amy Howe's reporting.

Contradictions

90%

Examples:

  • The Supreme Court is set to consider a challenge to rulings from a California-based appeals court that found punishing people for sleeping outside when shelter space is lacking amounts to unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment. This contradicts Grants Pass, Oregon's enforcement of camping bans, which has a vacancy rate of one percent with essentially no affordable housing.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

  • No deceptive practices could be found in Amy Howe's reporting.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Obstruction Charge in Jan. 6 Capitol Case, Potentially Affecting Hundreds of Defendants

Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Obstruction Charge in Jan. 6 Capitol Case, Potentially Affecting Hundreds of Defendants

Broke On: Friday, 28 June 2024 The Supreme Court narrowed the interpretation of Section 1512(c)(2) of Title 18 of the US Code in a ruling that could impact over 300 Jan. 6 defendants and two charges against former President Trump. The decision, which was met with dissent, focuses on obstructing an official proceeding to apply only to evidence tampering.
Supreme Court to Decide on Constitutionality of Grants Pass's Homeless Ordinances: Implications for Cities and Housing Solutions

Supreme Court to Decide on Constitutionality of Grants Pass's Homeless Ordinances: Implications for Cities and Housing Solutions

Broke On: Friday, 19 April 2024 The Supreme Court will hear a case on the constitutionality of ordinances in Grants Pass, Oregon that prohibit homeless individuals from using blankets, pillows, or cardboard boxes for protection while sleeping within city limits. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has previously ruled such laws as illegal due to violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment when no shelters are available. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for cities across the country dealing with homelessness, potentially leading to more arrests and fines instead of focusing on housing solutions.