Emily Peck

Emily Peck is a markets correspondent at Axios. She co-authors Axios Markets, a daily newsletter covering the latest markets trends and economic insights. Emily covers the intersection of business, policy, and politics with a focus on financial regulation and economic inequality. Prior to joining Axios, she was an economics reporter at The Huffington Post.

Biography:  https://www.axios.com/authors/epeck

88%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

75%

Examples:

  • The article has a clear slant towards worker-friendly policies and presents the new rules as positive developments for workers.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Deceptions

85%

Examples:

  • The article implies that the new rules are part of a broader effort by the White House to support workers, without providing direct evidence for this claim.
  • The article uses vague language when stating there's an imbalance of power between employers and workers.

Recent Articles

FTC's Decision to Ban Noncompete Agreements: A Victory for Workforce Mobility or Unintended Consequences?

FTC's Decision to Ban Noncompete Agreements: A Victory for Workforce Mobility or Unintended Consequences?

Broke On: Tuesday, 23 April 2024 The FTC's recent vote to ban noncompete agreements for most employees aims to protect American workers' economic liberty, affecting around 18% of the workforce. The decision sparks debate on its impact on business information protection and competition.