Shaila Dewan,
Shaila Dewan is a national correspondent for The New York Times, specializing in criminal justice coverage. She has worked at The Times since 2000 and has covered various beats including the New York Police Department and the American South. Her focus on criminal justice includes topics such as police reform, medical examiner bias, flawed forensic science, and jail deaths. Dewan is a graduate of Rice University and a native of Houston, Texas.
98%
The Daily's Verdict
This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.
Bias
100%
Examples:
- Shaila Dewan appears to have a strong focus on criminal justice and its impact on various communities. She has covered topics related to policing, courts, and prisons across the United States.
Conflicts of Interest
100%
Examples:
- Shaila Dewan's coverage of criminal justice may potentially lead to conflicts of interest, but no specific examples have been identified in the provided articles.
Contradictions
50%
Examples:
- Hundreds of pro-Palestine student protesters disrupted UC Berkeley's graduation ceremony on May 11, 2024.
- UC Berkeley graduation ceremony disrupted by anti-Israel protests
Deceptions
100%
Examples:
No current examples available.
Recent Articles
UC Berkeley Graduation Disrupted by Pro-Palestine Protests: Hundreds Interrupt Ceremonies with Chants and Signs
Broke On: Saturday, 11 May 2024Pro-Palestine protests disrupted the University of California, Berkeley's graduation ceremonies on May 11, 2024. Hundreds of students chanted and took over a section of California Memorial Stadium, interrupting speeches and ignoring rules against displays of signs. UC Berkeley Chancellor Carol Christ described the protests as 'civil disobedience' but warned against interruptions. The University opposes divestment from Israel due to academic freedom concerns. Protesters argued they were standing up for their beliefs, while others felt frustrated about the disruption.