Jordan King

Jordan King is a news reporter with a focus on politics and the judiciary. He has covered multiple high-profile cases and court decisions, offering in-depth analysis and critical commentary on the legal system and those involved. His work often explores the intersections of law, politics, and society, providing readers with unique insights into current events. Through his reporting, King aims to inform the public about complex legal issues while also challenging conventional wisdoms and prompting deeper reflection on our legal systems.

92%

The Daily's Verdict

This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.

Bias

90%

Examples:

  • Jordan King's reporting on the Supreme Court often includes critical analysis of the justices and their decisions.
  • The author has a tendency to present opinions as facts in their reporting.

Conflicts of Interest

95%

Examples:

  • Jordan King's reporting on Amy Coney Barrett's net worth and her connection to the Supreme Court could be seen as exploitative.
  • There is also a potential conflict of interest in Jordan King's reporting on Joe Biden, as he is a prominent political figure.

Contradictions

80%

Examples:

  • However, in another article they stated that Alito compared emergency abortions to cancer patients demanding experimental drugs.
  • In one article, Jordan King reported that under Idaho law a medical exception for an abortion only applies when a doctor judges it necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman.
  • This contradiction highlights a lack of attention to detail or an inconsistent understanding of the subject matter.

Deceptions

90%

Examples:

  • In one article, they referred to Alito's comparison of emergency abortions to cancer patients as 'disrespectful' to cancer patients.
  • Jordan King's reporting on the Supreme Court often includes inflammatory language and emotive descriptions that could be seen as deceptive.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Orders Idaho Hospitals to Provide Emergency Abortion Care: A Legal Battle Over Federal Law and State Rights

Supreme Court Orders Idaho Hospitals to Provide Emergency Abortion Care: A Legal Battle Over Federal Law and State Rights

Broke On: Thursday, 27 June 2024 The Supreme Court ruled on June 27, 2024, that Idaho hospitals receiving federal funds must provide emergency abortion care to stabilize patients despite the state's ban. This decision came after a woman named Nicole Miller was denied treatment at St. Luke's Boise Medical Center and sent out of state for an abortion due to heavy bleeding and hemorrhaging during her pregnancy. The court dismissed the appeal without addressing whether federal law mandating doctors provide care overrides state bans, leaving both sides frustrated.
Israeli-Egyptian Border Clash: Egyptian Soldier Killed, Tensions Escalate Between Israel and Egypt

Israeli-Egyptian Border Clash: Egyptian Soldier Killed, Tensions Escalate Between Israel and Egypt

Broke On: Monday, 27 May 2024 Israeli and Egyptian forces clashed near the Rafah border crossing in Gaza Strip on May 27, 2024, resulting in the death of an Egyptian soldier. The incident followed Israeli strikes on Rafah city that killed two senior Hamas figures and escalated tensions between Israel and Egypt. Despite international calls for a ceasefire, Israel continued military operations in Rafah, eliminating key Hamas commanders and officials.