Jamie Raskin

Jamie Raskin is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Maryland's 8th congressional district. He has been in office since January 2017. Prior to his political career, Raskin worked as an attorney and served as a public defender for over two decades. Raskin gained national attention for his role in the second impeachment of former President Donald J. Trump, which he led as the manager of the impeachment trial. He has been vocal in his opposition to Trump's actions surrounding the January 6th attack on the Capitol and has been a strong advocate for democracy and voting rights. In addition to his political work, Raskin is also an author. His book, 'Unthinkable: A Political Memoir,' details his personal experiences during the period surrounding his son's suicide, the January 6th attack on the Capitol, and Trump's impeachment trial.

Biography:  https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/06/us/politics/jamie-raskin-unthinkable-jan-6.html

22%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a poor reputation for journalistic standards and is not considered a reliable news source.

Bias

50%

Examples:

  • The article does not contain any clear examples of bias.

Conflicts of Interest

0%

Examples:

  • There are no conflicts of interest identified in the article.

Contradictions

25%

Examples:

  • The article does not contain any major contradictions.

Deceptions

0%

Examples:

  • The article does not contain any deceptive practices.

Recent Articles

Justice Alito's Controversial Flags: A Test of Ethics and Transparency at the Supreme Court

Justice Alito's Controversial Flags: A Test of Ethics and Transparency at the Supreme Court

Broke On: Thursday, 30 May 2024 Chief Justice Roberts declined a meeting request from Democratic lawmakers regarding flags at Justice Alito's properties, associated with Trump supporters and the Capitol riot. Alito claimed ignorance of their meaning and refused to recuse from related cases. The controversy highlights the need for transparency and ethics reform in the Supreme Court as it weighs cases tied to the 2020 election and January 6 riot.