Stephanie Gallman,
Stephanie Gallman is a CNN Assignment Editor with over 17 years of experience at CNN in various roles including writer, producer and tour guide. She has been with the network since 2005. Her work has primarily focused on breaking news and feature stories across a variety of topics including politics, crime, natural disasters and human interest pieces.
83%
The Daily's Verdict
This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.
Bias
95%
Examples:
- Stephanie Gallman has been an assignment editor, writer, producer and tour guide at CNN since 2005.
Conflicts of Interest
100%
Examples:
No current examples available.
Contradictions
85%
Examples:
- Louisiana is now the first state to require the Ten Commandments to be displayed in every public school classroom
- This story has been updated with additional details.
Deceptions
50%
Examples:
- Opponents of the bill have argued that a state requiring a religious text in all classrooms would violate the establishment clause of the US Constitution, which says that Congress can 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion'.
Recent Articles
Tragic Plane Crash Claims Lives of Five Family Members in New York
Broke On: Monday, 01 July 2024A family of five tragically died in a plane crash in upstate New York after attending a baseball tournament. The single-engine Piper Malibu Mirage, piloted by Roger Beggs, was en route to Atlanta when it crashed near Sidney. The cause of the crash is under investigation by the FAA and NTSB. Louisiana's New Law: Ten Commandments in Every Public School Classroom - Historical Significance or Religious Coercion?
Broke On: Wednesday, 19 June 2024Louisiana's new law, signed by Governor Jeff Landry, mandates the display of the Ten Commandments in all public classrooms from kindergarten to universities. The controversial move has sparked legal challenges from civil rights groups and debates over constitutionality. Supporters argue for historical significance and protection under recent Supreme Court decisions.