Agnès PEDRERO

A Swiss court handed jail sentences to four members of Britain's richest family, the Hindujas, on Friday, branding them

78%

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

90%

Examples:

  • The defendants' motives were selfish.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • The family denied all allegations, claiming that prosecutors wanted to 'do in the Hindujas.'
  • They had reached a confidential out-of-court settlement with the three employees who made the accusations against them, leading them to drop their legal action.

Contradictions

85%

Examples:

  • The court acquitted them of the more serious charge of human trafficking, on the grounds that the workers had travelled to Switzerland willingly.
  • The Hindujas confiscated their staff's passports and rarely allowed them outside their villa.
  • The Hindujas paid their staff only $8 for working up to 18 hours a day, less than a tenth of the wage mandated by Swiss law.

Deceptions

40%

Examples:

  • The defence had also claimed that Namrata Hinduja was pregnant at the time of the alleged offences and could not have committed some of the acts she was accused of.
  • The defence had argued that the three employees received ample benefits, were not kept in isolation and were free to leave the villa.

Recent Articles

Four Members of the Hindujas Family, UK's Wealthiest with 37 Billion Pounds Net Worth, Sentenced for Exploiting Indian Staff in Switzerland

Four Members of the Hindujas Family, UK's Wealthiest with 37 Billion Pounds Net Worth, Sentenced for Exploiting Indian Staff in Switzerland

Broke On: Friday, 21 June 2024 Four members of the Hindujas family, one of the UK's wealthiest with an estimated net worth of 37 billion pounds, were sentenced to jail terms for exploiting Indian staff at their Swiss villa. The family paid low wages, confiscated passports, and forced long hours without overtime. Prosecutors argued they took advantage of vulnerable immigrants for financial gain.