Miranda Nazzaro,

Miranda Nazzaro is a reporter at The Hill, where she covers legal affairs and the Supreme Court. Prior to joining The Hill, she was a staff writer at Politico covering the Justice Department and law enforcement. She has also contributed to The New York Times and other publications.

Biography:  https://thehill.com/author/miranda-nazzaro/

85%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

50%

Examples:

  • The article presents a viewpoint that suggests the White House may have exerted undue influence on social media platforms.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • The article discusses a case involving social media platforms and the White House, which could potentially raise conflicts of interest for the author.

Contradictions

50%

Examples:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that federal courts lack jurisdiction over a case where plaintiffs sued the federal government for social media platforms' decision to remove or demote some of the plaintiffs' content. This contradicts the Biden administration's claim that it was merely encouraging platforms to moderate content.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Rules on Biden Administration's Social Media Censorship Cases: Plaintiffs Lack Standing

Supreme Court Rules on Biden Administration's Social Media Censorship Cases: Plaintiffs Lack Standing

Broke On: Wednesday, 26 June 2024 The Supreme Court ruled against state attorneys general in Murthy v. Missouri and Alito v. Biden cases, determining they lacked standing to challenge the Biden administration's communications with social media companies over alleged censorship of certain topics.