Dan Shaw

Dan is a business journalist with diverse experience in local newspapers, industry publications and international media. He spent two years as an editor at China Daily after graduating from the University of Missouri-Columbia. His work has covered banking, local governments and the legal profession among other subjects. Currently, he focuses on how politics, policy and regulation impact the financial planning industry.

Biography:  https://www.financial-planning.com/author/dan-shaw

100%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.

Bias

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Strips SEC of Power to Impose Fines and Seize Assets Through Administrative Law Judges: Implications for Federal Agencies and Jarkesy's Case

Supreme Court Strips SEC of Power to Impose Fines and Seize Assets Through Administrative Law Judges: Implications for Federal Agencies and Jarkesy's Case

Broke On: Thursday, 27 June 2024 In a landmark decision, the US Supreme Court ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) cannot impose fines or force wrongdoers to return ill-gotten gains through administrative law judges (ALJs), overturning Jarkesy's $1 million penalty for securities misstatements. The ruling could impact dozens of federal agencies, potentially stripping them of their ability to seek civil penalties.