Salvador Rizzo,

Salvador Rizzo is a reporter based in Alexandria, Virginia. He covers crime and courts for The Washington Post and has previously worked for The Fact Checker, as well as various newspapers in New Jersey and Washington D.C. Rizzo is the co-author of 'Donald Trump and His Assault on Truth' (Scribner, 2020). His education is in English from Emory University.

Biography:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/salvador-rizzo/

76%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

75%

Examples:

  • The author's work appears to be generally neutral, but there is a slight lean towards highlighting the potential consequences of certain legal actions.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • The author has a professional relationship with The Washington Post which may influence their reporting.

Contradictions

33%

Examples:

  • Assange pleaded guilty to a single felony charge for publishing U.S. military secrets.
  • Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, was released from custody.
  • ]The Justice Department was warned that their battle to bring Julian Assange from Britain to the United States to stand trial for publishing secret diplomatic and military files was likely to fail if a deal was not made before a U.K. court's April 16 deadline to provide assurances related to free speech.[

Deceptions

50%

Examples:

  • ]Discussions of a plea with Assange's legal team had been underway since August. But top officials in the Justice Department did not act on the idea.[
  • If a deal is not made with the WikiLeaks founder before a U.K. court's April 16 deadline to provide assurances related to free speech, they will lose all their leverage and possibly their British attorneys, who increasingly saw the case as unwinnable.
  • The urgency here has now reached a critical point. The case will head to appeal and we will lose.

Recent Articles

Julian Assange Pleads Guilty to Single Felony Charge on Saipan: Implications and Reactions

Julian Assange Pleads Guilty to Single Felony Charge on Saipan: Implications and Reactions

Broke On: Tuesday, 25 June 2024 In a surprising turn of events on June 26, 2024, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange pleaded guilty to a single felony charge for publishing U.S. military secrets in a deal with Justice Department prosecutors, securing his freedom and ending the long-standing legal battle over press freedom and national security concerns. Assange arrived on Saipan, a historic island known for its WWII history and controversial Battle of Saipan, to make his plea at the United States District Court.