Randall D.

Randall Jarrell was an American poet, literary critic, and professor. He was born on March 28, 1914, in Nashville, Tennessee. Jarrell attended Vanderbilt University before transferring to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill where he received his undergraduate degree in 1935. He later earned a master's degree from Columbia University and a Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin–Madison. Jarrell was known for his modernist poetry, which often dealt with themes of love, loss, and mortality. His work as a literary critic contributed to the recognition of Flannery O'Connor and Robert Lowell as important American writers. In addition to his writing career, Jarrell also taught at various universities including Vanderbilt University, Smith College, and the University of Texas at Austin. He passed away on November 30, 1965.

66%

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

75%

Examples:

  • The author argues that the Supreme Court's interpretation of the federal obstruction-of-justice statute is not supported by the plain text and creates ambiguity where none exists.
  • They claim that the majority disregards the will of Congress and ties the hands of prosecutors in all cases based on hypotheticals divorced from the facts before it, further increasing its own power at the expense of other branches of government.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • There are no specific examples of conflicts of interest mentioned in the provided articles.

Contradictions

85%

Examples:

  • The author states that the federal obstruction-of-justice statute at issue in Fischer (18 U.S.C. 1512(c)) prohibits all potential means of corrupt obstruction as per its clear language.
  • They also mention that the Court's interpretation that Subsection 2 of the statute only applies to obstruction that impairs the availability or integrity of evidence in a proceeding is not supported by the plain text and creates ambiguity where none exists.

Deceptions

15%

Examples:

  • The author accuses the Supreme Court of pretending to deploy textualism in pursuit of its preferred outcome.
  • They also claim that the mental gymnastics employed by the Court to reach the result in Fischer highlight how this Court often only pretends to deploy textualism in pursuit of its preferred outcome.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Law Used to Prosecute Capitol Rioters, Including Former Officer Joseph Fischer

Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Law Used to Prosecute Capitol Rioters, Including Former Officer Joseph Fischer

Broke On: Wednesday, 06 January 2021 The Supreme Court narrowed the scope of a law used to prosecute individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riot, affecting approximately 249 cases. The ruling determined that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act only applies to limited circumstances involving evidence tampering and not broader situations. Former police officer Joseph Fischer's obstruction charge was sent back for further proceedings.