James Matthews

Sky News's top 10 doorstep interviews from US correspondent James Matthews. Friday 16 February 2024 05:04, UK Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player Matthews puts the spotlight on political and world leaders.

Biography:  https://news.sky.com/video/watch-us-correspondent-james-matthews-best-doorsteps-13072680

84%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

79%

Examples:

  • Joe Biden didn’t want the Supreme Court decision, that’s clear.
  • The ruling will read as 'banana republic' to Democrats and it will register beyond the core vote.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Deceptions

74%

Examples:

  • Biden himself - his health, durability and suitability for office.
  • Joe Biden didn’t want the Supreme Court decision, that’s clear.
  • The ruling will read as 'banana republic' to Democrats and it will register beyond the core vote.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court Declines to Rule on Florida and Texas Social Media Laws: Implications for Free Speech Rights

Supreme Court Declines to Rule on Florida and Texas Social Media Laws: Implications for Free Speech Rights

Broke On: Monday, 01 July 2024 The Supreme Court declined to rule definitively on Florida and Texas social media laws in July 2024, leaving these regulations in limbo. The cases challenge state control over content moderation on privately-owned platforms, with the Florida law preventing permanent bans for political candidates and the Texas law prohibiting removal based on user viewpoint. Lower courts will now analyze constitutional challenges to these laws.