Kyle Schnitzer,

Kyle Schnitzer is a reporter at the New York Post, where he covers crime and city politics. He previously worked as a sports reporter at The Post and wrote about the workplace for Ladders. A Siena College graduate, he has also contributed to Vanity Fair, Vice, Robb Report, Artnet among others. In his spare time, Kyle enjoys reading. His reporting focuses on crime and city politics with primary topics being legal matters and political events.

Biography:  https://nypost.com/author/kyle-schnitzer/

99%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author is known for its high journalistic standards. The author strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. The author has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.

Bias

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Contradictions

85%

Examples:

  • Donald Trump is attempting to overturn his Manhattan hush money conviction using the Supreme Court's recent ruling on presidential immunity.
  • Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has left open the possibility of vacating the jury’s verdict, but legal experts believe it’s unlikely as covering up payments to a porn star is not considered part of a president’s official duties.
  • The high court’s decision dealt a blow to the federal election-interference case against Trump but has little chance of overturning his Manhattan conviction.
  • Trump’s lawyers argue that jurors were improperly allowed to hear testimony from his former top communications aide Hope Hicks about conversations that occurred during Trump’s time in the White House.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Recent Articles

Supreme Court's Ruling on Presidential Immunity: What it Means for Trump's Cases and US Foreign Policy

Supreme Court's Ruling on Presidential Immunity: What it Means for Trump's Cases and US Foreign Policy

Broke On: Wednesday, 03 July 2024 The Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity has sparked controversy, particularly in the context of former President Trump's ongoing hush money case. The decision grants presidents broad immunity for official acts, raising concerns about its impact on specific cases and US foreign policy. Despite the Constitution not granting presidents absolute immunity once they leave office, Monday's ruling in Trump v. United States limits the admissibility of certain evidence against former presidents.