Cassandra Jaramillo,Jeremy

Cassandra Jaramillo is an investigative reporter at ProPublica, specializing in reproductive health and voting rights. She joined the newsroom in 2022 after graduating from the University of Texas at Austin. Her work has been recognized by the Livingston Award for her reporting on True the Vote, a nonprofit organization that spread misinformation about election fraud. Based in Texas, she continues to uncover critical stories related to reproductive rights and voting access.

Biography:  https://www.propublica.org/people/cassandra-jaramillo

85%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

85%

Examples:

  • But an investigation by ProPublica and CBS News found that the system that funnels a growing pot of state money to anti-abortion nonprofits has few safeguards and is riddled with waste.
  • Distributing a single pamphlet can net the same $14 fee.
  • Their budget infusions for the Alternatives to Abortion program grew with almost every legislative session ­– first gradually, then dramatically ­– from $5 million starting in 2005 to $140 million after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the right to an abortion.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • But an investigation by ProPublica and CBS News found that the system that funnels a growing pot of state money to anti-abortion nonprofits has few safeguards and is riddled with waste.
  • Distributing a single pamphlet can net the same $14 fee.
  • Their budget infusions for the Alternatives to Abortion program grew with almost every legislative session ­– first gradually, then dramatically ­– from $5 million starting in 2005 to $140 million after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the right to an abortion.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

  • But an investigation by ProPublica and CBS News found that the system that funnels a growing pot of state money to anti-abortion nonprofits has few safeguards and is riddled with waste.
  • Year after year, while Roe v. Wade was the law of the land, Texas legislators passed measures limiting access to abortion...And with the same cadence, they added millions of dollars to a program designed to discourage people from terminating pregnancies.

Deceptions

70%

Examples:

  • But an investigation by ProPublica and CBS News found that the system that funnels a growing pot of state money to anti-abortion nonprofits has few safeguards and is riddled with waste.
  • Year after year, while Roe v. Wade was the law of the land, Texas legislators passed measures limiting access to abortion...And with the same cadence, they added millions of dollars to a program designed to discourage people from terminating pregnancies.

Recent Articles

Texas' Alternatives to Abortion Program: $140 Million in Funding and Lack of Oversight Since Roe v. Wade Overturned

Texas' Alternatives to Abortion Program: $140 Million in Funding and Lack of Oversight Since Roe v. Wade Overturned

Broke On: Tuesday, 09 July 2024 Texas' Alternatives to Abortion program, which has seen a budget surge after Roe v. Wade was overturned, faces scrutiny for lack of oversight on $140 million in taxpayer funds.