Rebecca Rosenberg,

Rebecca Rosenberg is a seasoned journalist with expertise in crime and criminal justice. She has extensively covered high-profile cases such as the Alex Murdaugh double murder trial in South Carolina, the defamation battle of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in Virginia, and Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial in Manhattan. After earning her master's degree from Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, she worked as a national correspondent for the New York Post. Currently, she is a reporter at Fox News focusing on crime stories and providing insightful analysis. You can reach her at rebecca.rosenberg@fox.com or follow her on Twitter @ReRosenberg.

Biography:  https://www.foxnews.com/person/r/rebecca-rosenberg

75%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

85%

Examples:

  • Covered high-profile cases such as Alex Murdaugh double murder trial, Johnny Depp and Amber Heard defamation battle, Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial
  • Focus on crime and criminal justice

Conflicts of Interest

90%

Examples:

  • Rebecca Rosenberg is a veteran journalist with a focus on crime and criminal justice. She has covered numerous high-profile cases over her career such as the Alex Murdaugh double murder trial in South Carolina, the defamation battle of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in Virginia and Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial in Manhattan.

Contradictions

80%

Examples:

  • Thomas Matthew Crooks' parents called police to report him missing hours before the shooting at former president Trump's rally. Contradictory information about Alec Baldwin's Rust shooting trial.

Deceptions

50%

Examples:

  • As a defense attorney, you always want to humanize someone that's on trial, to show that they're more than this incident that's under a microscope.
  • Legal observers speculated the Baldwins wanted to humanize Alec Baldwin in the eyes of potential jurors.
  • The toddler, one of the couple's seven children, was taken out of the car. Hilaria held the baby girl in view of the cameras before quickly handing her off to a caretaker.

Recent Articles

Parents of Allegheny County Man Reported Missing Before He Attempted to Assassinate Former President Trump

Parents of Allegheny County Man Reported Missing Before He Attempted to Assassinate Former President Trump

Broke On: Thursday, 18 July 2024 Thomas Matthew Crooks, a Bethel Park High School alumnus and former community college student, attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally in 2024. His parents had contacted authorities expressing concern for his welfare prior to the attack. The FBI is investigating Crooks' motive and scrutiny has fallen on the Secret Service for their security measures at the event. Crooks managed to bypass them and get close enough to Trump with an AR-style rifle belonging to his father.
Jury Selected for Alec Baldwin's Trial in Fatal Shooting of Cinematographer Halyna Hutchins: What to Expect

Jury Selected for Alec Baldwin's Trial in Fatal Shooting of Cinematographer Halyna Hutchins: What to Expect

Broke On: Thursday, 21 October 2021 Twelve jurors selected for Alec Baldwin's trial in New Mexico, where he faces involuntary manslaughter charges for fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on 'Rust' set. Baldwin claims not guilty, jury selection follows intense media scrutiny. Outcome uncertain as both sides present compelling arguments.