Kate Shaw,

Kate Shaw is a legal expert with extensive experience in constitutional law and teaching. She currently serves as a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and has previously taught at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. In addition to her academic background, she has worked in the White House Counsel's Office and clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens and Judge Richard Posner. Shaw is also a contributor at ABC News and co-hosts the Supreme Court podcast

Biography:  https://www.nytimes.com/column/kate-shaw

83%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

50%

Examples:

  • The author's writing seems to lean towards a balanced view on the Supreme Court decisions but leans slightly more towards expressing concern over the expanded powers of presidents.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • The author is a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and has served as an associate counsel in the White House Counsel's Office. This could potentially raise questions about conflicts of interest.

Contradictions

50%

Examples:

  • The article mentions that the president's power is limited by the Constitution, but it also states that presidents have expanded their powers through executive orders, appointments, and pushing agendas when Congress doesn't push back. This could be seen as a contradiction in terms of presidential power.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Recent Articles

Senate Plans to Strip Trump of Immunity: A Shift in Presidential Powers and the Role of the Supreme Court

Senate Plans to Strip Trump of Immunity: A Shift in Presidential Powers and the Role of the Supreme Court

Broke On: Thursday, 11 July 2024 The Supreme Court's ruling on Trump's immunity sparks legislative response, with Schumer planning to draft a bill stripping Trump of immunity for election-related actions. Critics argue the decision could impact future presidents' criminal exposure and balance of power. The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing in September to discuss potential limitations on presidential immunity.