David Tuller,

David Tuller is a lecturer in public health and journalism at the University of California, Berkeley. He has a background in investigative journalism and has written extensively about scientific misconduct and the PACE trial.

72%

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

10%

Examples:

  • The authors are criticized for failing to consider alternative explanations for the results, such as the possibility that patients were influenced by expectations or previous treatments.
  • The authors of the PACE trial and their supporters are accused of promoting a flawed study that overstated the effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy and graded exercise therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.
  • The study is also criticized for using a broad definition of chronic fatigue syndrome that may have included patients who did not truly have the condition.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • The authors of the PACE trial may have had a conflict of interest in promoting their own hypothesis about chronic fatigue syndrome, which they claimed could be treated with cognitive behavior therapy and graded exercise therapy.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

  • Despite assertions of robust evidence from those most invested in promoting it, the FND construct was based largely on speculation and assumption.
  • The results of the PACE trial contradicted the fundamental experience of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, who knew that even mild exertion could increase their symptoms.
  • The study's findings went against established knowledge in the scientific community about the organic basis of chronic fatigue syndrome.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

  • The PACE trial may have been deceptive in its presentation of results, as it used a broad definition of chronic fatigue syndrome that likely included patients who did not truly have the condition, and failed to consider alternative explanations for the results.

Recent Articles

Uncovering the Prevalence and Impacts of Long Covid: Insights from Leading Researchers and Policymakers

Uncovering the Prevalence and Impacts of Long Covid: Insights from Leading Researchers and Policymakers

Broke On: Tuesday, 09 July 2024 Long Covid, a condition marked by persistent symptoms for three months or more after initial infection, affects tens of millions worldwide. According to reports, approximately 7% of U.S. adults had suffered from it as of early 2023. Symptoms include fatigue, brain fog, and respiratory issues (CDC). Women and White/Hispanic individuals are more likely to be affected. One study found that one in ten people infected during pregnancy developed long Covid, with symptoms persisting for up to 10 months. Long Covid can lead to new behavioral health conditions or worsen pre-existing ones. Research is crucial for understanding causes and developing effective treatments.