Wilson Chapman

Wilson Chapman is a dedicated journalist with a strong background in journalism and political science. He currently serves as the Curation Editor for IndieWire, where he leads the site's evergreen content team. Prior to his role at IndieWire, Wilson worked as a news writer and staff writer for the publication. He has also interned at U.S. News and World Report, Discover Magazine, and Variety Magazine, where he wrote over 700 stories during his time there. In his writing for IndieWire, Wilson specializes in covering anime, independent cinema, and LGBTQ entertainment. He is known for his film reviews and analysis pieces as well. His favorite films include 'Mulholland Drive,' 'The Age of Innocence,' and 'Cleo From 5 to 7.' Wilson also enjoys watching TV shows like 'The Simpsons,' 'Twin Peaks,' and 'Mad Men.'

84%

The Daily's Verdict

This author has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on the author's reporting.

Bias

50%

Examples:

  • Wilson Chapman's biography does not mention any specific instances of bias in his reporting.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

  • No conflicts of interest found in Wilson Chapman's reporting.

Contradictions

75%

Examples:

  • The article states that the movie is a sequel to the 1996 film 'Twister,' but it contradicts itself by mentioning Daisy Edgar-Jones and Glen Powell as the leads, who are not from the original 'Twister'.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

  • No deceptive practices found in Wilson Chapman's reporting.

Recent Articles

Twisters: Balancing Self-Awareness and Earnestness in the Quest to Neutralize Tornadoes

Twisters: Balancing Self-Awareness and Earnestness in the Quest to Neutralize Tornadoes

Broke On: Friday, 19 July 2024 Twisters, a new disaster film set for release on July 20, 2024, stars Daisy Edgar-Jones and Glen Powell as storm chasers attempting to neutralize tornadoes using sodium polyacrylate. With an opening weekend projection of $75M-$80M and strong support from non-political audiences, the film focuses on scientific principles rather than climate change messages.