New Scientist Magazine
New Scientist Magazine is a reputable source of science news, providing in-depth reporting on the latest discoveries and research across various fields. The articles are written in an accessible style that is easy to understand for a general audience. While there are occasional instances of contradictions and deceptive practices, the overall quality of the reporting is high and free from conflicts of interest.
93%
The Daily's Verdict
This news site is known for its high journalistic standards. It strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. It has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.
Bias
100%
Examples:
- New Scientist Magazine presents news in a factual and informative manner without any clear signs of editorial bias.
Conflicts of Interest
100%
Examples:
- There are no clear instances of conflicts of interest present in New Scientist's reporting.
Contradictions
85%
Examples:
- In another article, it was stated that primordial black holes, which are known as odd black holes smaller than protons, may have once littered the cosmos. This contradicts the current understanding of black hole formation.
- In one article, it was mentioned that approximately 1 in 9 children in the US have been diagnosed with ADHD, contradicting the previous belief that only about 5% of children in the US had been diagnosed with ADHD.
Deceptions
80%
Examples:
- Another article implied that only minor changes were made in response to climate change after a volcanic super-eruption. However, research shows that Toba's super-eruption led to significant environmental and ecological changes which had a profound impact on human societies.
- In one article, it was suggested that health professionals recommend xylitol for patients with obesity, diabetes or prediabetes to improve glycemic control. However, the article does not mention that xylitol is a sugar alcohol commonly used in sugar-free products.