Kentucky.com

Kentucky.com is a news source that provides local and regional news coverage for the state of Kentucky. They cover a wide range of topics including politics, government, education, and more.

92%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This news site is known for its high journalistic standards. It strives to maintain neutrality and transparency in its reporting, and avoids conflicts of interest. It has a reputation for accuracy and rarely gets contradicted on major discrepancies in its reporting.

Bias

80%

Examples:

  • In the article 'Kentucky transgender minors, families plan to appeal to U.S. Supreme Court over new KY law', there is a bias towards Republican Attorney General Daniel Cameron. His statement is presented without any counter-argument or perspective from the opposing side.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Contradictions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Deceptions

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Recent Articles

  • ACLU and Families Petition Supreme Court Over Gender-Affirming Care Ban

    Broke On: Wednesday, 01 November 2023 The ACLU and several families of transgender teenagers have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review a ban on gender-affirming care for minors in Tennessee. The law includes a phase-out period by March 31, 2024, for ongoing medical treatments and stipulates that no new treatments could be started. Major medical associations, more than 20 of which have signed on to the lawsuit in support of the plaintiffs, unanimously oppose this type of health care ban.