boebert.house.gov

This is a news site run by Lauren Boebert, a Republican Congresswoman from Colorado. The site claims to provide information about her work in Congress, her views on various issues, and how she can help constituents with federal agencies. However, the site is heavily biased against Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden and uses inflammatory language to attack them without providing any evidence or context for their criticisms. The site also has a conflict of interest because Boebert is part of the same political system that she claims to oppose and relies on personal opinions rather than facts. Additionally, the site is deceptive by using misleading language and omitting important information to manipulate readers' emotions.

52%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This news site has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on its reporting.

Bias

10%

Examples:

  • The article is biased against Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden
  • The article uses inflammatory language such as 'Pelosi-Esque' spending deal and 'Bidenomics'

Conflicts of Interest

50%

Examples:

  • The article has a conflict of interest because Boebert is part of the same political system that she claims to oppose
  • The article relies on personal opinions rather than facts and selective quoting of statistics without providing context or linking to peer-reviewed studies
  • The article uses emotional appeals such as 'slap in the face' and 'worst-ever border crisis' to manipulate readers' emotions

Contradictions

85%

Examples:

  • The article claims that Boebert didn't run for Congress to stand by and watch out-of-touch politicians continue to sell out America, but then supports a deal that does exactly that
  • The article contradicts itself by saying that the CR continues funding levels set by Pelosi while also criticizing those same levels

Deceptions

85%

Examples:

  • The article exaggerates statistics such as saying that inflation is at its highest in 40 years when it was actually higher in the late 1970s and early 1980s
  • The article is deceptive because it uses misleading language such as 'kicks the can down the road' and 'fails to make the necessary cuts'
  • The article omits important information such as how much of the national debt is due to military spending and interest on previous debts

Recent Articles

  • Government Faces Funding Crisis as Congress Passes Short-Term Spending Bills

    Government Faces Funding Crisis as Congress Passes Short-Term Spending Bills

    Broke On: Friday, 19 January 2024 Congress is unable to agree on a budget, leading to a funding crisis. Short-term spending bills have been passed as lawmakers work towards a comprehensive plan for the upcoming fiscal year. The latest bill has been approved by both chambers of Congress and sent to President Biden's desk, but some members are dissatisfied with this solution.