WLIW21
WLIW21 is a respected and innovative public media provider that is part of the WNET family of companies. The station serves Long Island and the greater tri-state community with quality arts, education, and public affairs programming. WLIW21 also produces local programs and broadcasts popular PBS shows, British television favorites, and Emmy Award-winning series. As part of its mission to use media for lifelong learning opportunities, WLIW21 provides online initiatives and community outreach. The station reaches approximately 1 million people each week across New York City's five boroughs, Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey, and Connecticut.
80%
The Daily's Verdict
This news site has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on its reporting.
Bias
86%
Examples:
- The article presents the hockey stick graph as if it became a target because of its success in helping make global warming accessible to a wide audience, but Penn State found no evidence of scientific misconduct in their investigation into Mann's work.
Conflicts of Interest
75%
Examples:
- Steyn called Mann's research fraudulent.
- The article presents the hockey stick graph as if it became a target because of its success in helping make global warming accessible to a wide audience, but Penn State found no evidence of scientific misconduct in their investigation into Mann's work.
Contradictions
99%
Examples:
- The article implies that Michael Mann is being sued for defamation when he is actually suing two individuals for making false statements about him.
- The defendants, Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg, made statements that were critical of Michael Mann's work and compared him to a convicted child molester.
Deceptions
80%
Examples:
- Steyn compared Mann to Sandusky as if it were an objective fact when Simberg and Steyn expressed this opinion.
- The article implies that Michael Mann is being sued for defamation when he is actually suing two individuals for making false statements about him.
- The defendants, Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg, made statements that were critical of Michael Mann's work and compared him to a convicted child molester.