Louisiana Illuminator

The Louisiana Illuminator is an independent, nonprofit news organization focused on investigating how state policies affect marginalized communities in Louisiana. The site leans towards highlighting the negative consequences of political decisions and exposing corruption. It covers a range of topics including politics, environment, health care, and economic development. The site is an affiliate of States Newsroom and receives funding from grants, donations, and readers like you. It retains full editorial independence and is presented to readers free of charge without advertising.

70%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This news site has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on its reporting.

Bias

75%

Examples:

  • The article quotes the Biden campaign's statement criticizing Trump's comments as authoritarian, indicating a preference for Biden's stance.
  • The Louisiana Illuminator portrays itself as a nonpartisan news organization, but it leans towards highlighting the negative consequences of political decisions and exposing corruption. It often centers on Louisianians who are poor or otherwise marginalized.

Conflicts of Interest

90%

Examples:

  • The Louisiana Illuminator is an affiliate of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news organization. This relationship could potentially create a conflict of interest if the Illuminator's coverage aligns too closely with the views or interests of its parent organization.

Contradictions

40%

Examples:

  • The article discusses Trump's plans for mass deportations and the use of various forces to carry them out, but it does not address potential logistical challenges or opposition from civil liberties groups.

Deceptions

40%

Examples:

  • The article does not explicitly state that Trump's comments were made during an interview, which could mislead readers about the context in which they were made.
  • The article does not mention that Trump's use of the military for deportations would likely violate the Posse Comitatus Act.

Recent Articles

  • Trump's Plan for Mass Deportations: A Look at His Interviews and Controversial Proposals

    Trump's Plan for Mass Deportations: A Look at His Interviews and Controversial Proposals

    Broke On: Wednesday, 01 May 2024 Former President Trump outlined his plans for deporting millions of undocumented immigrants during interviews with Time magazine and other outlets, comparing the situation to countries like Venezuela and referencing Operation Wetback as a model. He estimated between 15-20 million undocumented individuals reside in the US, suggesting using local law enforcement, National Guard, and military for deportations. Trump questioned applicability of laws preventing military action against civilians and downplayed detention camps. Trump's stance on immigration has been contentious; critics include human rights organizations and political opponents. Debate surrounds stricter enforcement versus compassionate policies.