Undark

Undark is a non-profit, editorially independent magazine covering the complicated and often fractious intersection of science and society. The publication aims to explore science in both light and shadow, without focusing on “science communication” or related euphemisms, but rather true journalistic coverage of the sciences. Undark's journalism has been recognized with numerous accolades and awards, including finalist nominations for the National Magazine Award in the Reporting category, and for Single Topic Issue. The site provides articles on a variety of scientific topics, with a focus on the potential impacts of science on society and individuals.

85%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermines the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
Analysis.OverallConflictOfInterestScore * 0.3F + Analysis.OverallBiasScore * 0.3F + Analysis.DeceptivenessScore * 0.3F + Analysis.ReadabilityScore * 0.1F

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Daily's Verdict

This news site has a mixed reputation for journalistic standards. It is advisable to fact-check, scrutinize for bias, and check for conflicts of interest before relying on its reporting.

Bias

85%

Examples:

  • But, at least so far, the emerging science on neurological effects is not reflected in regulations.
  • Nor do they contain advisories for pregnant women
  • The science on that effect is unsettled, and most experts say better research is needed.

Conflicts of Interest

100%

Examples:

No current examples available.

Contradictions

95%

Examples:

  • Elevated fluoride levels could have neurodevelopmental effects, including lowering children's IQs and harming developing fetuses.
  • The town of Seagraves in West Texas has high levels of fluoride in its tap water.

Deceptions

70%

Examples:

  • Lost in that debate are the roughly 3 million Americans whose water naturally contains higher concentrations of fluoride
  • Many experts believe that at some point, high fluoride levels ought to be a matter of greater concern

Recent Articles

  • The Fluoride Debate: Preventing Tooth Decay or Neurodevelopmental Risks?

    The Fluoride Debate: Preventing Tooth Decay or Neurodevelopmental Risks?

    Broke On: Tuesday, 07 May 2024 This article examines the debate over fluoride in public drinking water, discussing its benefits for dental health according to organizations like the ADA and CDC, as well as potential neurological risks from high fluoride levels. The author emphasizes the importance of understanding all available information to make informed decisions about personal and family health.