Kimmel took shots at Rodgers' intelligence during his monologue on Monday and Tuesday
Rodgers accused Kimmel of not listening to what he said last week about the Jeffrey Epstein client list
The feud between Aaron Rodgers and Jimmy Kimmel has escalated
The feud between Aaron Rodgers and Jimmy Kimmel has taken a turn for the worse, with both sides making accusations against each other. On Tuesday, Rodgers went on a long tangent about how he never called Kimmel a pedophile and wondered whether the comedian actually listened to what he said last week when he said people like Kimmel do not want the Jeffrey Epstein client list to come out. Meanwhile, Kimmel took shots at Rodgers' intelligence during Monday's monologue and had more on Tuesday. The war of words between these two former sports stars has become a major problem for ESPN, which purchased Pat McAfee Show with the idea that it would be a solution to their future problems.
Kimmel took shots at Rodgers' intelligence during Monday's monologue
AARON RODGERS FIRES BACK AT JIMMY KIMMEL, DENIES CALLING LATE-NIGHT HOST 'PEDOPHILE'
Rodgers said he would be OK being called a conspiracy theorist because of his track record in recent years but scoffed at being called an antisemitic or anything else.
Incorrect. But that's the environment we're in.
Accuracy
Rodgers also took issue with people allegedly trying to 'cancel' him
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses inflammatory language such as 'delusional people' and 'cancelling' to create a false sense of urgency and importance around Aaron Rodgers' comments. This is an example of sensationalism and selective reporting, as it only reports on the most controversial aspects of Rodgers' statements while ignoring other important points he made. Secondly, the author uses quotes from ESPN senior vice president Mike Foss to make it seem like he supports Kimmel when in fact Foss has not publicly commented on the matter. This is an example of deception by omission and bias as it misrepresents Foss's position. Thirdly, Rodgers makes several points about informed consent and the importance of considering all available information before making decisions, but these are ignored in favor of focusing solely on his supposed anti-vax stance.
The author uses inflammatory language such as 'delusional people' to create a false sense of urgency and importance around Aaron Rodgers' comments. This is an example of sensationalism and selective reporting, as it only reports on the most controversial aspects of Rodgers' statements while ignoring other important points he made.
The author uses quotes from ESPN senior vice president Mike Foss to make it seem like he supports Kimmel when in fact Foss has not publicly commented on the matter. This is an example of deception by omission and bias as it misrepresents Foss's position.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by calling people 'delusional' and using phrases like 'tripledemic'. They also use an appeal to authority when they quote Rodgers saying something without providing any context or evidence for their claim.
The tripledemic is the flu COVID and RSV all teaming up like the three amigos of phlegm,
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses inflammatory language such as 'delusional people' and 'tripledemic' to make a political statement without providing any evidence or context for these claims. Additionally, the author takes shots at Aaron Rodgers by calling him an intelligence insult which is not relevant to the topic being discussed in this article.
Aaron Rodgers made a comment on Jimmy Kimmel's show that suggested the late-night host was associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
Rodgers has since clarified his comments and stated he does not believe Kimmel is on the list of people who were involved in Epstein's crimes.
Kimmel dedicated seven minutes to responding to Rodgers' comment, calling him arrogant and ignorant.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, Aaron Rodgers claims that Jimmy Kimmel was associated with Jeffrey Epstein when there is no evidence to support this claim. Secondly, Rodgers insinuates that Kimmel made a joke about him being on the list of people who were accused of crimes related to Epstein when in fact he never mentioned anything about it. Thirdly, Rodgers claims that he was addressing the feud with Kimmel so that those tuning into his show could go about their day, which is not true as there are many other topics being discussed on television at any given time.
Aaron Rodgers claimed that Jimmy Kimmel was associated with Jeffrey Epstein when there is no evidence to support this claim.
Rodgers insinuated that Kimmel made a joke about him being on the list of people who were accused of crimes related to Epstein when in fact he never mentioned anything about it.
Rodgers claimed that he was addressing the feud with Kimmel so that those tuning into his show could go about their day, which is not true as there are many other topics being discussed on television at any given time.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains an informal fallacy called 'False Dilemma'. The author presents a false choice between two options when in reality there may be more than two. In this case, the author implies that either Rodgers is accusing Kimmel of pedophilia or he's just mad at him for making fun of his topknot and lies about being vaccinated. However, it's possible that Rodgers could have been expressing both opinions simultaneously.
Either he actually believes my name was going to be on Epstein's list,
Bias
(85%)
The author has a clear bias against Jimmy Kimmel and is using inflammatory language to attack him. The author also seems to be trying to deflect attention from his own comments by accusing Kimmel of being associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
> Aaron Rodgers said he’s not stupid enough <br>to accuse Jimmy Kimmel of pedophilia, but doesn’t apologize for Jeffrey Epstein comment. Here’s the latest.<br><br>
Jimmy Kimmel skewered Aaron Rodgers on Monday<sup>th</sup>©s Jimmy Kimmel Live! over comments the NFL quarterback recently made insinuating the late-night host was associated with Jeffrey Epstein. <br><br>
On Tuesday, Rodgers had his weekly appearance on ESPN➴the program that got him in hot water with Kimmel last week  ¡where he essentially claimed his comments were misinterpreted by Kimmel and the media.<br>
Rodgers stated. <strong>Kimmel</strong> dedicated seven minutes for his rebuttal to Rodgers<sup>©</sup>, whom Kimmel called <em>arrogant</em>, <em>ignorant</em><br>
<strong>Kimmel declared on his first show of the new year:</strong> Either he actually believes my name was going to be on Epstein<sup>©</sup> ’s list, which is insane, or the more likely scenario is he doesn’t actually believe that, he just said it because he’s mad at me for making fun of his topknot and his lies about being vaccinated.<br><br>
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Taryn Ryder has a conflict of interest on the topic of Jeffrey Epstein as she is owned by ESPN which was mentioned in her article.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Taryn Ryder has a conflict of interest on the topics of Jimmy Kimmel and Aaron Rodgers as she is reporting on their feud. She also has a conflict of interest on the topic of Jeffrey Epstein as she reported on his comment made by Rodgers.
Rodgers has used the platform to suggest ties between Jimmy Kimmel and Jeffrey Epstein
McAfee tried to downplay Rodgers' accusation as a joke but it didn't work
Kimmel fired back on his show's opening monologue of the year, taking Rodgers to task for his suggestion
Accuracy
Aaron Rodgers and Pat McAfee have become a problem for ESPN
Rodgers has used the platform to suggest ties between Jimmy Kimmel and Jeffrey Epstein, which led to a feud with Kimmel
Deception
(80%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents Aaron Rodgers as a problem for ESPN when he has been the biggest draw for their platform. Secondly, it portrays Pat McAfee's show as an unchecked space where anything goes and no one gets held accountable. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalism to make claims about Rodgers calling out executives without providing any evidence of this happening.
The article presents Aaron Rodgers as a problem for ESPN when he has been the biggest draw for their platform.
It portrays Pat McAfee's show as an unchecked space where anything goes and no one gets held accountable.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the success of ESPN's acquisition of Pat McAfee's show as evidence that it will be a solution to their problems. However, this is not necessarily true and does not account for any potential negative consequences or unintended outcomes. Additionally, the article contains examples of inflammatory rhetoric by Aaron Rodgers when he suggests ties between Jimmy Kimmel and Jeffrey Epstein on his show.
The Pat McAfee Show was purchased by ESPN with the idea of it being a major solution to their problems
Rodgers inexplicably used the platform to suggest ties between ABC's late-night show host, Jimmy Kimmel, and Jeffrey Epstein
McAfee called out ESPN executive Norby Williamson by name for supposedly leaking false ratings information
Bias
(80%)
The author of the article is Mike D. Sykes, II and he has a history of making biased statements in his previous articles. In this article, he makes several claims that are not supported by facts or evidence.
, Aaron Rodgers can tell Mike Foss he doesn't work for him and continue to come on an ESPN show? OK, cool. It seems to me that anybody who is a part of this show is given carte blanche.
McAfee makes the big bucks and is treated differently because of his salary.
Pat McAfee calls an ESPN executive a “rat” live on the air and nothing happens? Got it.
Pat McAfee draws in the audience ESPN covets. The viewership numbers are not that impressive, it only averaged 332,000 viewers through December.
The problem with Gen Z sports fans: Only 23 percent describe themselves as “passionate”
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest with Pat McAfee as they are both involved in the ESPN beef. The article does not disclose this conflict.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Aaron Rodgers and Pat McAfee's beef with ESPN. The author is affiliated with both ESPN and Pat McAfee through his work as an NFL insider for ESPN and his appearance on The Pat McAfee Show.
The article mentions that the author, Mike D. Sykes, II, has worked as an NFL insider for ESPN.
Tafoya criticized Jimmy Kimmel's rant about Rodgers and accused him of making snobbish comments.
Rodgers went on a long tangent earlier Tuesday, saying he never called Kimmel a pedophile and wondered whether the comedian actually listened to what he said last week when he said people like Kimmel do not want the Jeffrey Epstein client list to come out.
Accuracy
Kimmel took shots at former President Trump during his monologue on Monday.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by describing Kimmel's rant as a 'predictable' and 'disconnect in America right now'. Secondly, the author misrepresents Tafoya's comments on Trump to make it seem like she supports him when she actually criticizes his behavior. Thirdly, the article is selectively reporting by only mentioning Kimmel's attacks on Rodgers while ignoring other instances of Kimmel attacking people for their political beliefs.
The article is selectively reporting by only mentioning Kimmel's attacks on Rodgers while ignoring other instances of Kimmel attacking people for their political beliefs.
The author uses sensationalism by describing Kimmel's rant as a 'predictable' and 'disconnect in America right now'.
The author misrepresents Tafoya's comments on Trump to make it seem like she supports him when she actually criticizes his behavior.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The author is biased towards Aaron Rodgers and against Jimmy Kimmel. The author uses language that dehumanizes Jimmy Kimmel by calling him a 'disconnect in America' and an 'I am smarter because I disagree with you'. The author also makes personal attacks on Jimmy Kimmel, such as saying he is snobbish for suggesting Aaron Rodgers is dumb due to his community college education. Additionally, the author uses language that demonizes Trump by calling him a 'weird freaking time in America' and implying that everything comes back to Trump.
It's so predictable
Jimmy Kimmel thinks he’s smarter than you and everyone else, including Aaron Rodgers. Jimmy Kimmel thinks that because he and Aaron Rodgers disagree about stuff, that he is smarter than Aaron Rodgers.
The disconnect in America right now, in a nutshell
