Boeing Engineer Exposes Potential Safety Risks in 787 Dreamliner Production: Allegations of Manufacturing Shortcuts and Retaliation

North Charleston, South Carolina United States of America
Allegations of manufacturing shortcuts and retaliation
Boeing engineer exposes potential safety risks in 787 Dreamliner production
Boeing introduced shortcuts to address bottlenecks in production process
Potential compromise of planes' structural integrity during flights
Sam Salehpour testifies before Senate committee
Boeing Engineer Exposes Potential Safety Risks in 787 Dreamliner Production: Allegations of Manufacturing Shortcuts and Retaliation

Boeing, the aerospace giant, is under intense scrutiny following a series of safety concerns raised by whistleblowers and investigative reports. The latest controversy involves the 787 Dreamliner planes and allegations of production shortcuts that could potentially compromise their structural integrity.

Sam Salehpour, a Boeing engineer with over a decade of experience, testified before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee's investigations subcommittee on April 17, 2024. He detailed his concerns about manufacturing shortcuts that could lead to planes breaking apart during flights.

Mr. Salehpour stated that Boeing introduced these shortcuts in an attempt to address bottlenecks in the production process of the 787 Dreamliner planes. He claimed that these changes affected how sections of the aircraft were fastened together, potentially putting lives at risk.

The engineer faced punishment for raising his concerns and even believed a tire was punctured as a form of retaliation while he was at work. Mr. Salehpour's allegations come after Boeing acknowledged manufacturing changes on the 787 program but maintained that the durability of the airframe was not affected.

Ed Pierson, a former Boeing manager, also testified before the Senate panel and criticized both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for ignoring manufacturing issues at Boeing until an incident occurred. The FAA is currently investigating Boeing in response to these concerns.

The safety culture at Boeing has been under scrutiny since two crashes of the 737 Max jets killed 346 people in 2018 and 2019. MIT aeronautics lecturer Javier de Luis, who lost his sister in one of these crashes, commented on the disconnect between management's words about safety and workers' observations on the factory floor.

Boeing has been under pressure to improve its safety culture and address concerns raised by whistleblowers. The company invited reporters to its South Carolina factory to reassure the public of the safety of its 787 Dreamliner planes, but these efforts have not quelled growing concerns about Boeing's manufacturing practices.



Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • Are the allegations of manufacturing shortcuts accurate?
  • Has Boeing addressed all safety concerns raised by the whistleblower?
  • How will the FAA's investigation impact Boeing?

Sources

98%

  • Unique Points
    • Sam Salehpour testified about production shortcuts at the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee's investigations subcommittee.
    • Boeing introduced shortcuts to address bottlenecks in manufacturing process of 787 Dreamliner planes.
    • Mr. Salehpour stated that these shortcuts could potentially lead to planes breaking apart during flights.
    • Mr. Salehpour claimed that Boeing was putting out defective planes and he faced punishment for raising concerns.
    • According to Mr. Salehpour, manufacturing changes affected how sections of the Dreamliner were fastened together.
  • Accuracy
    • Sam Salehpour stated that these shortcuts could potentially lead to planes breaking apart during flights.
    • Boeing acknowledged manufacturing changes but expressed confidence in the plane’s safety and durability.
    • A Boeing engineer testified that the company is taking shortcuts in assembling 787 Dreamliners, leaving sections of an aircraft’s skin vulnerable to breaking apart.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

87%

  • Unique Points
    • Boeing was subject to dual Senate hearings examining allegations of major safety failures and flawed safety culture.
    • An expert panel report issued in February stated that Boeing’s approach to safety remains flawed despite improvements made after crashes of two Boeing Max jets killed 346 people.
    • Employees who raise concerns about safety at Boeing could be subject to pressure and retaliation.
    • A door-plug panel blew off a 737 Max jetliner during an Alaska Airlines flight in January, causing concern over the aircraft’s safety.
    • MIT aeronautics lecturer Javier de Luis, who lost his sister in a 2019 Boeing 737 Max 8 crash, commented on the disconnect between management’s words about safety and workers’ observations on the factory floor.
    • Former Boeing manager Ed Pierson told a Senate subcommittee that Boeing failed to improve safety after the two 737 Max crashes in 2018 and 2019, and that federal agencies have become lazy in their oversight of the company.
  • Accuracy
    • Boeing introduced shortcuts to address bottlenecks in manufacturing process of 787 Dreamliner planes.
    • Portions of the fuselage were improperly fused together, which could cause planes to break apart mid-flight after extended use.
    • Sections of the aircraft's skin are vulnerable to breaking apart.
  • Deception (70%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the allegations against Boeing's safety culture. The author does not provide any counter-evidence or context to balance the story. Additionally, there are emotional manipulation and sensationalism in the article as it focuses on personal stories of victims and their families, which can evoke strong emotions from readers.
    • They hear, ’Safety is our number one priority,’ What they see is that’s only true as long as your production milestones are met.
    • One of the witnesses, MIT aeronautics lecturer Javier de Luis, lost his sister when a Boeing 737 Max 8 crashed in Ethiopia in 2019.
    • Boeing was the subject of dual Senate hearings Wednesday as Congress examined allegations of major safety failures at the embattled aircraft manufacturer
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The article contains several instances of Appeals to Authority fallacy. The senators and experts quoted in the article are used as authorities to support the claims made about Boeing's safety culture and practices. However, this does not necessarily mean that their claims are valid or true. Additionally, there is an instance of Hasty Generalization when Sen. Cruz states that 'flying commercial remains the safest way to travel, but understandably, recent incidents have left the flying public worried.' This statement is based on a general assumption about public perception without providing any concrete evidence.
    • Sen. Ted Cruz: 'Flying commercial remains the safest way to travel, but understandably, recent incidents have left the flying public worried.'
    • MIT aeronautics lecturer Javier de Luis: 'They hear, “Safety is our number one priority,” what they see is that’s only true as long as your production milestones are met.'
    • Sen. Richard Blumenthal: 'Our panel planned to hold further hearings on the safety of Boeing’s planes and expected Boeing CEO David Calhoun to appear for questioning.'
  • Bias (95%)
    The article reports on Senate hearings examining allegations of safety failures at Boeing. The author quotes Senators and witnesses expressing concerns about Boeing's safety culture and the potential for employees to face retaliation for raising concerns. The article also includes testimony from a Boeing engineer about shortcuts being taken in assembling 787 Dreamliners, which leaves sections of the aircraft's skin vulnerable to breaking apart. The author does not express any bias in their reporting, but the quotes from Senators and witnesses demonstrate a critical perspective towards Boeing's safety practices.
    • They are putting out defective airplanes.
      • ]They hear, ’Safety is our number one priority,’ What they see is that’s only true as long as your production milestones are met, and at that point it’s ’Push it out the door as fast as you can.’[
        • What they see is a very real fear of payback and retribution if you held your ground.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        94%

        • Unique Points
          • Boeing retaliated against Salehpour after he raised concerns, including isolation, transfers, threats and blocking him from documenting issues and sharing information
          • Salehpour believes a tire was punctured while he was at work as a form of retaliation
          • Ed Pierson, a former Boeing manager, testified that both the FAA and NTSB bear some responsibility for ignoring manufacturing issues at Boeing until the Alaska Airlines incident.
          • The FAA is investigating Boeing and has criticized its safety culture in a report
          • Pierson called for truth-telling and accountability to address the issues at Boeing
        • Accuracy
          • Boeing retaliated against Salehpour after he raised concerns
          • Boeing introduced shortcuts to address bottlenecks in manufacturing process of 787 Dreamliner planes.
          • Salehpour stated that these shortcuts could potentially lead to planes breaking apart during flights.
          • Employees who raise concerns about safety at Boeing could be subject to pressure and retaliation.
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting Ed Pierson, the executive director of The Foundation for Aviation Safety and a former Boeing manager. While this quote adds credibility to the article's claims, it is not a logical argument on its own and does not necessarily prove the existence of fallacies in Boeing's safety culture. Additionally, there are instances of inflammatory rhetoric used by Senators Roger Marshall and Richard Blumenthal when they state that 'there are mounting, serious allegations that Boeing has a broken safety culture and a set of practices that are unacceptable.' This statement is an emotional appeal rather than a logical argument. Lastly, the author uses dichotomous depiction by stating 'The good news is the employees of Boeing and these agencies can overcome poor leadership, we need them to be successful.' This statement implies that there are only two possibilities: either Boeing has poor leadership or its employees cannot succeed. However, it is possible for both factors to exist simultaneously.
          • ]The good news is the employees of Boeing and these agencies can overcome poor leadership, we need them to be successful.[/]
        • Bias (95%)
          The author, Taylor Giorno, presents the whistleblower's allegations of retaliation from Boeing without any apparent bias. However, there are a few instances where the author uses language that could be perceived as depicting Boeing in a negative light. For example, she describes the airline giant's manufacturing issues as 'defective airplanes,' and notes that Boeing is facing multiple investigations from regulators and lawmakers. While this language may not be intentionally biased, it could be perceived as having a negative slant towards Boeing. However, given the serious nature of the allegations and the fact that they are being made by a whistleblower, it is reasonable for the author to use such language. Therefore, while there may be some subtle bias in the author's choice of words, it does not appear to be significant enough to warrant a score below 95.
          • Salehpour also said his boss told him he would have ‘killed someone’ who said what he said in a meeting, and called him incessantly on his personal phone. He also said he was blocked from documenting issues and sharing information with subject matter experts.
            • The allegations hit the already embattled airline manufacturer, which is facing multiple investigations from regulators and lawmakers after the door plug of a 737 Max 9 plane blew off shortly after takeoff on an Alaska Airlines flight on Jan. 5.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            94%

            • Unique Points
              • Boeing engineer Sam Salehpour went public with safety concerns about the 787 Dreamliner’s structural integrity
              • Salehpour claimed sections of the fuselage were not properly fastened together and could suffer structural failure over time
            • Accuracy
              • Boeing invited reporters to its South Carolina factory and top engineers vouched for the plane's safety
              • Boeing expressed confidence in the plane’s safety and durability despite manufacturing changes affecting how sections of the Dreamliner were fastened together.
              • Boeing dismissed allegations made by the whistleblower about defective airplanes and shortcuts in assembling 787 Dreamliners.
            • Deception (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Fallacies (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication