Jacob Wright wore an Apple Vision Pro headset during his wedding day
Some people are praising his decision to wear it for photos with bridesmaids and groomsmen during a reception party while others are criticizing him for disrespecting his wife Cambree by doing so
The photo of him wearing the headset has gone viral on various social media platforms including Twitter, X, Reddit, and Instagram
A software engineer named Jacob Wright wore an Apple Vision Pro headset during his wedding day, sparking controversy and debate about the appropriate use of technology in personal settings. The photo of him wearing the headset has gone viral on various social media platforms including Twitter, X, Reddit, and Instagram. While some people are praising his decision to wear it for photos with bridesmaids and groomsmen during a reception party, others are criticizing him for disrespecting his wife Cambree by doing so.
Jacob Wright wore an Apple Vision Pro headset during his wedding day.
The photo of Jacob and Cambree wearing the Apple VisionPro has gone viral on Twitter, X, Reddit, and Instagram.
Accuracy
Cambree shot a disgusted look as she held her flower bouquet while Jacob was wearing the headset.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author presents the story as if it were a lighthearted and amusing tale of a groom wearing an Apple Vision Pro headset on his wedding day when in reality it portrays Cambree Wright's disgust at her husband's choice to wear such technology during their special moment. Secondly, the article uses sensationalist language by describing the couple as being
Cambree shot a disgusted look as she held her flower bouquet while Jacob was seemingly in his world.
Jacob Wright dances at the reception fully equipped with the white, 2-pound headset strapped to his face.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains an example of a dichotomous depiction. The author presents the groom's decision to wear his Apple Vision Pro headset as both creepy and uncanny at the same time.
> Cambree said she tries not to look at Wright when he has on the headset because it’s <br>creepy and a little uncanny.
Cambree recalled that Jacob Wright danced with his bride fully equipped with the white, 2-pound headset strapped to his face.
<br>The Apple Vision Pro is a virtual reality headset that displays digital content within a person’s physical space.
Bias
(80%)
The author has a clear bias towards the negative impact of technology on society. The article portrays Jacob Wright's decision to wear his Apple Vision Pro headset during his wedding day as an example of how technology can disrupt traditional values and cause harm to relationships.
<img src=
> The Apple Vision Pro is a virtual reality headset that displays digital content within a person's physical space. <br> > > Erik Pendzich/Shutterstock
> When wearing the Apple headset, a user can navigate by using their voice, hands, and of course, eyes. <br> > At one point, Cambree said she had to guard Wright's headset during the photoshoot because she was afraid Wright would try to wear it during the actual wedding ceremony.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author Joshua Lynch has a conflict of interest on the topic of Apple Vision Pro as he is an employee at Yahoo. He also has a personal relationship with Jacob Wright who was featured in the article.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Apple Vision Pro as they are an engineer at Apple. The article also mentions that the groom's wife is creeped out by his use of the device which could be seen as bias.
The groom wore an Apple Vision Pro VR headset at his wedding.
He only donned the headset after the ceremony and for photos with bridesmaids and groomsmen.
Accuracy
Jacob Wright asked Cambree if he could wear the headset during their ceremony, but she refused and only allowed him to use it at the reception.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article suggests that the groom wore a Vision Pro VR headset during his wedding ceremony when he did not. Secondly, it implies that Jacob Wright only put on the headset after taking photos with his bride and groomsmen which was not true as he had already taken off his suit before putting on the headset. Thirdly, there is no evidence to suggest that Cambree Wright was unhappy about her husband wearing a VR device during their wedding day.
The title of the article suggests that Jacob Wright wore a Vision Pro VR headset during his wedding ceremony when he did not.
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards the idea that wearing a VR headset on your wedding day is not only acceptable but also desirable. The author uses quotes from the couple to present their perspective in a positive light and emphasizes the benefits of using spatial computing technology for capturing memories.
The groom was notably smiling; the bride, meanwhile, looks a little less than pleased.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author Maggie Harrison Dupré has a conflict of interest on the topic of Apple Vision Pro as she is wearing it during her wedding ceremony.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Apple Vision Pro as they are wearing it during their wedding ceremony.
Jacob asked Cambree if he could wear the headset during their ceremony, but she refused and only allowed him to use it at the reception.
Cambree shot a disgusted look as she held her flower bouquet while Jacob was wearing the headset.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Cambree doesn't hate Jacob despite her facial expression in the photo being interpreted as one of anger or disappointment by many on social media. However, it is clear from a Zoom call with her husband that she was indeed cold and not angry at all. Secondly, the article implies that Cambree didn't mean to marry young when she met Jacob but admits later in the article that she was career-oriented and wanted to be independent before meeting him. This contradicts her earlier statement which is misleading.
The author claims that Cambree doesn't hate Jacob despite her facial expression being interpreted as one of anger or disappointment by many on social media. However, it is clear from a Zoom call with her husband that she was indeed cold and not angry at all.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that the video of a man driving a Tesla Cybertruck hands-free wearing an Apple VisionPro in Lehi went viral. The author does not provide any evidence or citation for this claim.
Bias
(85%)
The article is about a man who wore a VR headset to his wedding and the attention it received on social media. The author does not make any political or religious biases apparent in their reporting. However, there are examples of bias present in the article.
> Cambree swears she wasn't mad. She was just cold.<br>Cambree admitted that <i>'I do look pissed,'</i> she said on a Zoom call with her husband.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article discusses a man who wore a V.R. headset to his wedding and the author's personal experience with virtual reality technology.
Jacob Wright wore an Apple Vision Pro headset during his wedding day.
The photo of Jacob and Cambree wearing the Apple VisionPro has gone viral on Twitter, X, Reddit, and Instagram.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Jacob infuriated his wife when he wore the Apple Vision Pro headset during their wedding photos. However, there is no evidence to support this claim and it seems like a sensationalized statement meant to grab readers' attention. Secondly, the article quotes Cambree as saying that she had tried to keep the wraparound headset away from the wedding photographer but eventually gave in when Wright put it on during the reception. However, there is no evidence of any attempt by Cambree to prevent Wright from wearing the headset during their ceremony or photos. Lastly, while some people online are criticizing Jacob's behavior as disrespectful and insensitive, others are defending his right to express himself individually which contradicts each other.
The article claims that Jacob infuriated his wife when he wore the Apple Vision Pro headset during their wedding photos. However, there is no evidence to support this claim.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains an example of a fallacy known as 'appeal to authority'. The author cites the opinions of several people without providing any evidence or reasoning for their claims. Additionally, there is no clear distinction between what constitutes appropriate use of technology in personal settings and what does not.
The software engineer told SFGATE that playing with new technology is his main hobby.
Bias
(75%)
The article is biased towards the idea that wearing a high-tech virtual reality headset during a wedding is disrespectful and insensitive. The author uses quotes from Cambree to support this claim, but fails to provide any evidence or context for her feelings on the matter. Additionally, the author implies that Jacob's decision to wear his Apple Vision Pro was solely motivated by his love of new technology rather than any personal preference.
