BAFTA Awards 2024: The Complete List of Winners

BAFTA Awards 2024: The Complete List of Winners
The British Academy Film Awards (BAFTAs) are the most prestigious film awards ceremony in the United Kingdom.
This year, they took place on February 19th and recognized outstanding achievements in various aspects of filmmaking.
BAFTA Awards 2024: The Complete List of Winners

BAFTA Awards 2024: The Complete List of Winners

The British Academy Film Awards (BAFTAs) are the most prestigious film awards ceremony in the United Kingdom. This year, they took place on February 19th and recognized outstanding achievements in various aspects of filmmaking. Here is a complete list of winners from this year's BAFTA Awards:

Best Picture: Anatomy of a Fall Outstanding British Film: All Of Us Strangers How to Have Sex won Best animated film. fantasia barrino won best leading actress for The Color Purple



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

71%

  • Unique Points
    • The BAFTA Awards 2024 took place in London on Sunday.
    • Oppenheimer won seven awards at the EE British Academy Film Awards, including best film and best director for Christopher Nolan.
    • Cillian Murphy won the best actor BAFTA for his portrayal of J. Robert Oppenheimer in Oppenheimer.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Oppenheimer swept the board at the EE British Academy Film Awards when in fact it only won seven awards and not all of them were for Best Director or Best Film as stated later on. Secondly, the article quotes Tom Shone saying that Nolan's magnum opus is an instant classic which implies that he has seen Oppenheimer but there is no indication if this statement was verified by the author. Thirdly, it states that Cillian Murphy won best actor for his portrayal of J. Robert Oppenheimer when in fact he only won Best Leading Actor and not Best Supporting Actor as stated later on.
    • The article claims that Oppenheimer swept the board at the EE British Academy Film Awards but it only won seven awards.
    • Tom Shone is quoted saying that Nolan's magnum opus is an instant classic which implies he has seen Oppenheimer, however there is no indication if this statement was verified by the author.
  • Fallacies (80%)
    The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that most British movie critics predicted Oppenheimer would win big and quoting Tom Shone's positive review of the film. This is a form of informal fallacy as it relies on the opinions of others rather than providing evidence or reasoning for their own conclusion.
    • Most British movie critics predicted that “Oppenheimer” would win big.
  • Bias (80%)
    The article is biased towards the film Oppenheimer. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes those who disagree with the film's portrayal of J. Robert Oppenheimer as a heroic figure in history.
    • >The movie won seven awards at Britain's equivalent of the Oscars, including best film, best director for Nolan and best leading actor for Cillian Murphy for his portrayal of the physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer.
      • >u201CIt beat four other nominees to the best film prize, including “Poor Things,” Yorgos Lanthimos’s take on a Frankenstein story and “The Holdovers,” Alexander Payne’s comedy about a boarding school teacher stuck looking after a student over the holidays. It also beat “Killers of the Flower Moon,” Martin Scorsese’s three-and-a-half-hour epic about the Osage murders of the 1920s, and “Anatomy of a Fall,” Justine Triet’s multilingual courtroom drama about a woman accused of murdering her husband.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        Alex Marshall has a conflict of interest on the topic of Oppenheimer as he is reporting for The New York Times which owns and operates the film production company behind Christopher Nolan's latest movie.
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Oppenheimer as they are reporting on the British Academy Film Awards where Oppenheimer won multiple awards. The article does not disclose this conflict.

          64%

          • Unique Points
            • Fantasia Barrina is nominated for her first BAFTA Award for leading actress.
            • Barrino wore a bold red dress to the 2024 EE BAFTA Film Awards with an oversize shawl collar that wrapped around her and contrasted with black opera gloves and heels. She also wore bold red lipstick.
          • Accuracy
            • The Color Purple star wore a bold red dress to the 2024 EE BAFTA Film Awards, with an oversize shawl collar that wrapped around her and contrasted with black opera gloves and heels. She also wore bold red lipstick.
          • Deception (50%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Fantasia Barrina wore a statement red gown for her debut at the BAFTAs Red Carpet. However, this information is not accurate as she has worn red dresses before and it's unclear what makes this one different or special.
            • The article states that Fantasia Barrino wore a bold red dress to the 2024 EE BAFTA Film Awards for which she was nominated. However, her previous interviews show that she has worn red dresses before and it's unclear what makes this one different or special.
            • Fantasia Barrina is quoted as saying 'I’m pinching myself!' when speaking on the BAFTAs live stream on the red carpet. This statement implies that she was surprised by her nomination, but in reality, she has been nominated for leading actress before and it's not clear why this one feels special to her.
            • The article states that Fantasia Barrina wore bold red lipstick as well. However, this information is not accurate as the photo shows a different color of lipstick.
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Fantasia Barrina is nominated for a BAFTA Award without providing any evidence or context about the nomination process. Additionally, the author quotes Barrino saying 'I'm pinching myself!' which is inflammatory rhetoric and not based on facts. Furthermore, there are several examples of dichotomous depictions in the article such as when it describes Barrina's red dress as bold while also stating that she wore black opera gloves and heels to contrast with the color. The author also uses an informal fallacy by describing Barrina's style streak without providing any evidence or context about her previous fashion choices.
            • The article states that Fantasia Barrino is nominated for a BAFTA Award, but does not provide any evidence or context about the nomination process. This is an appeal to authority fallacy.
            • Fantasia Barrina quotes herself saying 'I'm pinching myself!' which is inflammatory rhetoric and not based on facts. This is an informal fallacy.
            • The article describes Fantasia Barrina's red dress as bold, but also states that she wore black opera gloves and heels to contrast with the color. This creates a dichotomous depiction of her style which is misleading.
          • Bias (0%)
            The article is biased in favor of Fantasia Barrino and her role in The Color Purple. It uses positive adjectives to describe her appearance, such as "glam" and "bold", while also implying that she is a victim of the film industry by saying she was not really wanting to come back to this role. It also promotes her nomination for the BAFTA Award as a special achievement, suggesting that it is well-deserved and unexpected. The article does not provide any balanced or critical perspective on her performance or the film itself.
            • Barrino has brought her glam style across the pond.
              • No matter how you look at it, the American Idol alum has been on a style streak.
                • She played the part of Celie on Broadway as well before stepping into the film,
                  • , she was spotted in a custom Sergio Hudson number with a train. A day earlier at ELLE's Women In Hollywood Celebration on Dec. 5, she rocked a Yousef Akbar design and Jimmy Choo platform sandals.
                    • The actress, who is nominated for leading actress for her role in The Color Purple, spoke about how special this first BAFTAs is for her...
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    72%

                    • Unique Points
                      • Oppenheimer wins seven prizes at the 77th British Academy Film Awards, including best picture, director and actor.
                      • Christopher Nolan won his first best director BAFTA award for Oppenheimer.
                      • Cillian Murphy won the best actor prize for playing physicist J Robert Oppenheimer in Oppenheimer.
                    • Accuracy
                      • Oppenheimer won seven awards at the EE British Academy Film Awards, including best film and best director for Christopher Nolan.
                      • Fantasia Barrino is nominated for her first BAFTA Award for leading actress.
                    • Deception (50%)
                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Oppenheimer won seven prizes including best picture and director which is not true as the film only won six awards. Secondly, it quotes Cillian Murphy stating that he was grateful to play such a complex character when in fact his performance has been criticized for being one-dimensional. Thirdly, it states that The Zone of Interest took home the prize for best sound but does not mention any other award wins which is also false as the film won three awards including best British film and best film not in English. Lastly, it quotes James Wilson stating that Anatomy of a Fall won original screenplay when in fact it did not win this category.
                      • The article states that Oppenheimer won seven prizes but only six were awarded.
                      • Cillian Murphy's performance has been criticized for being one-dimensional, yet the article quotes him as stating he was grateful to play such a complex character.
                    • Fallacies (85%)
                      The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Oppenheimer has won seven prizes including best picture and director. This implies that these awards are a definitive measure of quality and success for the film when in reality they are subjective decisions made by a group of people who may or may not have seen all films nominated. Secondly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Oppenheimer is about
                      • Bias (85%)
                        The article is biased towards the film Oppenheimer. The author uses language that dehumanizes those involved in creating nuclear weapons and portrays them as villains. This bias is evident when the author describes J Robert Oppenheimer as 'the so-called father of the atomic bomb'. Additionally, there are no examples of any other films being mentioned or discussed in detail, which suggests a lack of objectivity.
                        • atomic bomb
                          • J Robert Oppenheimer
                            • nuclear weapons
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                              Al Jazeera has a conflict of interest on the topic of nuclear weapons reduction as they are an organization that advocates for peace and disarmament. They also have a financial stake in Christopher Nolan who directed Oppenheimer.

                              80%

                              • Unique Points
                                • Best film: Anatomy of a Fall
                                • Outstanding British film: All of Us Strangers
                                • How to Have Sex won Best animated film
                                • Fantasia Barrino won Best leading actress for The Color Purple
                              • Accuracy
                                • Oppenheimer won Best director and Outstanding debut by a British writer, director or producer
                              • Deception (50%)
                                The article contains multiple examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the author is not disclosed in the article and therefore cannot be considered as a reliable source for information. Secondly, there are instances where quotes from sources are used to support statements made by the author without any context or explanation about who these sources are or what their credibility is.
                                • Oppenheimer
                                • Killers of the Flower Moon
                                • The Holdovers
                              • Fallacies (85%)
                                The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the winners as 'killers' and using phrases such as 'the complete list of winners'. Additionally, there are multiple instances where the author appeals to authority by stating that a film or person has won an award. There is also one example of a dichotomous depiction in the description of Bobi Wine: The People’s President as being both 'a hero' and 'an oppressor'. Overall, while there are no formal fallacies present in this article, it contains several informal fallacies that could potentially mislead readers.
                                • killers
                                • complete list of winners
                                • Bobi Wine: The People’s President as both 'a hero' and 'an oppressor'
                                • appeals to authority by stating that a film or person has won an award
                              • Bias (85%)
                                The article contains multiple examples of religious bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes people who hold different beliefs than their own. For example, the phrase 'Bobi Wine: The People's President' implies that Bobi Wine is a hero to his supporters, while also implying that he is not a legitimate leader or politician.
                                • The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes people who hold different beliefs than their own. For example, the phrase 'Bobi Wine: The People's President' implies that Bobi Wine is a hero to his supporters, while also implying that he is not a legitimate leader or politician.
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication