Disney CEO Bob Iger has stated that the company's primary focus is on entertainment, not messaging.
Iger believes that Disney needs to be an entertainment-first company and has worked hard to achieve this goal.
Disney CEO Bob Iger has stated that the company's primary focus is on entertainment, not messaging. He believes that Disney needs to be an entertainment-first company and has worked hard to achieve this goal. In a recent interview with CNBC, he said:
The bottom line is that infusing messaging as a sort of number one priority in our films and TV shows is not what we're up to, Iger said. The audience wants to be entertained first and foremost.
Disney CEO Bob Iger said that the media conglomerate is prioritizing entertainment in its content over messaging.
<br>The bottom line is that infusing messaging as a sort of number one priority in our films and TV shows is not what we’re up to, Iger said.
Disney needs to be an entertainment-first company, and I have worked really hard to do that.<br>
Elsewhere in his interview with CNBC's Squawk on the Street, Iger told anchor David Faber that Disney is attempting to garner and maintain a diverse audience.
<br>The audience wants to be entertained first and foremost.
You can’t please everybody all the time.
Accuracy
<The bottom line is that infusing messaging as a sort of number one priority in our films and TV shows is not what we’re up to, Iger said.>
<The audience wants to be entertained first and foremost.>
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Disney's purpose is to entertain and not send messages. However, this contradicts previous statements made by Iger where he has claimed that the company would avoid being agenda-driven but its content focuses more on diversity and inclusion in recent years along with stances against harmful legislation.
Iger first served as Disney's CEO from 2005-2020. He returned in November 2022, after former CEO Bob Chapek was fired.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Disney CEO Bob Iger said something without providing any evidence or context for his statement. This is a form of hasty generalization as the author assumes that Iger's statement represents the company's position on messaging and entertainment, which may not be accurate. Additionally, the article contains an example of false dilemma by stating that Disney needs to prioritize either entertainment or messaging when in fact they can do both. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by referring to Iger as a
The bottom line is that infusing messaging as a sort of number one priority in our films and TV shows is not what we're up to,
Bias
(85%)
The author has a clear bias towards Disney's focus on entertainment over messaging. The author repeatedly states that the company is prioritizing entertainment and attempts to garner and maintain a diverse audience by focusing on entertaining content. This suggests that the author believes that Disney should not be seen as an agenda-driven or politically motivated entity, but rather one focused solely on providing entertainment for its viewers.
The bottom line is that infusing messaging as a sort of number one priority in our films and TV shows is not what we’re up to,
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Disney and Bob Iger as they are both affiliated with each other. The article also discusses CNBC's Squawk on the Street and David Faber which could be seen as an attempt to promote their own brand.
Bob Iger is CEO of Walt Disney Company, a company that he has been leading since 2015. He was also previously president of ABC Studios and chairman of The Walt Disney Company's Board of Directors.
Disney CEO Bob Iger said his company is not interested in sending messages in its movies and TV shows.
, Disney's No. 1 mission is to capture broad if increasingly diverse audiences.
, Peltz had also hit out at the company for having dabbled in 'woke' commentary.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Disney's mission is to entertain and not send messages. However, this statement contradicts previous statements made by Disney executives about their commitment to social responsibility and diversity. Secondly, the article quotes Nelson Peltz criticizing Marvel for having an all-Black cast in Black Panther. This quote is taken out of context as it was part of a larger argument that Peltz had with Iger about his leadership style and lackluster stock performance. Thirdly, Elon Musk's comments about diversity at Disney are also misleading as he has not been appointed head of diversity, equity and inclusion at the company.
Nelson Peltz hit out at the company for having dabbled in 'woke' commentary.
Disney CEO Bob Iger said his company is not interested in sending messages in its movies and TV shows.
Elon Musk joked on April Fool's Day that he had been appointed head of diversity, equity and inclusion at the company.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Disney's mission is to entertain and not send messages without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by suggesting that either Disney should focus on creating media properties with strong tie-ins to its parks or it should become more
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies.
The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Disney's mission is to entertain and not send messages without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim.
Bias
(85%)
The author of the article is Bob Iger and he states that Disney's mission is to entertain, not send messages. However, there are examples in the article where it appears that Disney has been sending messages through its movies and TV shows. For example, Nelson Peltz criticized Marvel for having an all-Black cast in Black Panther and Elon Musk joked about being appointed head of diversity at the company. These comments suggest that Disney is not solely focused on entertainment but also on addressing social issues.
Nelson Peltz asked,
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
There are multiple conflicts of interest found in this article.
Disney CEO Bob Iger is now free to focus on moving the company forward, with succession being a top priority.
Elon Musk's trolling of the company has no relevance to The Walt Disney Company or to Iger.
Accuracy
The board engaged in a succession process from the moment Iger came back and they are taking it very seriously.
Iger suggested that while his contract runs through 2026, his successor will be announced at the right time hinting that a name could emerge sooner.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that there was a lot of confusion about what 'woke' means when discussing Disney criticism. However, this statement contradicts previous statements made by Iger where he acknowledges that critiques of Disney's content as being woke may have some merit and that people use the term to describe different things. Secondly, the author claims that Peltz's crusade was a personal one given the backing of former Marvel chairman Ike Perlmutter. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and contradicts previous statements made by Iger where he acknowledges that there may have been some degree of personal animosity on Peltz's side. Thirdly, the author claims that Disney will be launching its first real foray into password sharing in June with a full rollout planned for September. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and contradicts previous statements made by Iger where he acknowledges that Netflix is currently leading the way in streaming and has done an excellent job. Finally, the author claims that Disney's goal is to solidify itself as the No. 2 in streaming but does not provide any evidence to support this claim.
The term woke is thrown around rather liberally, no pun intended in that regard.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when he says that the term 'woke' is thrown around liberally and not everyone understands what it means. He also uses inflammatory rhetoric when he describes Peltz's crusade as a personal one, even though Iger himself acknowledges that there was some degree of personal animosity involved. Additionally, the author uses an example of a dichotomous depiction when he says that Disney needs to be more sensitive to the interests of its diverse audience while also entertaining them.
The term 'woke' is thrown around liberally
Peltz's crusade was described as a personal one even though Iger acknowledges there was some degree of personal animosity involved
Disney needs to be more sensitive to the interests of its diverse audience while also entertaining them
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes those who hold different beliefs than him, such as referring to them as 'woke'. Additionally, the author implies that there is a personal animosity behind the proxy fight with Nelson Peltz.
I think people don't even understand really what it means.
Disney is not primarily concerned with infusing messaging into its programming
Elon Musk and Nelson Peltz are high-profile critics of Bob Iger's vision for Disney
'Woke' means different things to different people, but it generally refers to a focus on social justice issues
Accuracy
Disney CEO Bob Iger said that the media conglomerate is prioritizing entertainment in its content over messaging.
<br>The bottom line is that infusing messaging as a sort of number one priority in our films and TV shows is not what we’re up to, Iger said.
Disney needs to be an entertainment-first company, and I have worked really hard to do that.<br>
Elsewhere in his interview with CNBC's Squawk on the Street, Iger told anchor David Faber that Disney is attempting to garner and maintain a diverse audience.
<br>The audience wants to be entertained first and foremost.
You can’t please everybody all the time.
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses quotes from Elon Musk and Nelson Peltz to present their criticisms of Disney's direction as if they are representative of all critics. However, there may be other critics who do not share these views or have different reasons for their criticism. Secondly, the article presents Iger's response to Musk and Peltz as a dismissal of their concerns about Disney being too 'woke'. However, it is unclear whether Iger truly believes that Disney is not primarily concerned with infusing messaging into its programming or if he is simply trying to deflect criticism. Finally, the article uses the term 'woke' in quotes throughout and presents it as a catchall for critics of Disney. This implies that there may be different interpretations of what being 'woke' means, which could lead to confusion and misinterpretation.
The author uses quotes from Elon Musk and Nelson Peltz to present their criticisms of Disney as if they are representative of all critics. However, this is not necessarily the case.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several examples of appeal to authority fallacies. Bob Iger is presented as an expert on the topic and his opinions are given more weight than those of Elon Musk or Nelson Peltz, despite their criticisms being valid. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of Disney's focus on entertainment versus moralizing which can be seen in the quotes from Iger where he states that infusing messaging into programming is not what they are up to and that it needs to be entertaining first. This creates an either/or situation where one cannot have both, when in reality there may be room for both.
Bob Iger has a message for those criticizing Disney for being too “woke.” The Disney CEO sat for an interview at Disney HQ on Thursday and directly addressed high-profile critics including Elon Musk and Nelson Peltz about the direction in which he’s steering the entertainment behemoth. In the interview with CNBC reporter David Faber, Iger maintained that Disney is not primarily concerned with “infusing messaging” into its programming and that it remains “an entertainment-first company.”
While he's not concerned with Musk’s comedic stylings, Iger did indirectly address Musk’s notion that Disney has been going “woke,” promising that the company’s focus is on entertainment rather than moralizing. “Infusing messaging as the sort of number one priority in our films and TV shows is not what we’re up to. They need to be entertaining,” said Iger.
Despite the protestations of Musk and Peltz, he claimed that “the noise” pertaining to Disney and its purported “woke” pivot “has sort of quieted down,” and maintained that the word itself is starting to lose meaning, becoming a catchall for his detractors. “The term woke is thrown around rather liberally,” Iger said.
Anne Hathaway on Tuning Out the Haters and Embracing Her True Self
Bias
(80%)
The author of the article is Chris Murphy and he has a clear bias towards Disney CEO Bob Iger. The author presents quotes from Elon Musk and Nelson Peltz that criticize Iger's vision for Disney but does not present any counter-arguments or evidence to refute these claims. Additionally, the author uses language such as
Bob Iger has a message for those criticizing Disney for being too “woke.”
Iger certainly wasn't laughing. “I ignore it,” Iger told Faber, of Musk’s pestering.
Musk has taken it upon himself to wage a war against Iger’s vision of Disney.
